LA Police raid Sheens home

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
F

FaaR

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2007
1,056
412
136
Stop giving the man attention, without it he'll drift away and disappear like a bad funk in the wind.
 
davmat787

davmat787

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2010
5,512
24
76
FaaR said:
Stop giving the man attention, without it he'll drift away and disappear like a bad funk in the wind.
Click to expand...

Fine by me, I never tuned in to any of his ramblings. Either he has mental problems or is trolling warner bros, neither of which interested me. But I think this news indicates the former, we will see.
 
sunzt

sunzt

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 2003
3,076
3
81
FaaR said:
Stop giving the man attention, without it he'll drift away and disappear like a bad funk in the wind.
Click to expand...

He has 2 kids though, so that would be a concern if he was threatening with firearms.
 
I

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
can you stop reporting tabloid rumors as news? All I see quoted in that article are TMZ ....owned by Warner Brothers whom he is currently involved in a 100m lawsuit. Conflict of interest much?
 
airdata

airdata

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2010
4,987
0
0
I don't understand the logic behind agreeing to not possess firearms in accordance with a restraining order.

If a situation is so bad that somebody is thinking of killing another person, they will kill them. Guns are irrelevant to the situation.
 
I

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
airdata said:
I don't understand the logic behind agreeing to not possess firearms in accordance with a restraining order.

If a situation is so bad that somebody is thinking of killing another person, they will kill them. Guns are irrelevant to the situation.
Click to expand...

its an excuse to take away your second amendment. This is hippie liberal central California we are talking about.
 
F

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,152
55,684
136
airdata said:
I don't understand the logic behind agreeing to not possess firearms in accordance with a restraining order.

If a situation is so bad that somebody is thinking of killing another person, they will kill them. Guns are irrelevant to the situation.
Click to expand...

First thought to me would be that people who murder those who have a restraining order against them are quite likely to be crimes of passion/drunkenness/etc. While if someone wants to plot a careful assassination this certainly won't stop them, if they just got mad and drunk, not having a gun on hand seems like it really might help.
 
F

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,152
55,684
136
IceBergSLiM said:
its an excuse to take away your second amendment. This is hippie liberal central California we are talking about.
Click to expand...

The entire purpose of a restraining order is that your actions have merited sufficient judicial intervention as to limit your freedom of movement, your freedom of association, etc. I saw no registered complaint about their restriction of his first amendment right of association, so why the outrage for the second?
 
jonks

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
I guess he's not a scientologist, they would have straightened him out in the back room.
 
P

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Who cares? Within one or two years he will be losing his house because he owes the IRS back taxes.

He could still make a comeback.
 
ericlp

ericlp

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2000
6,139
236
106
piasabird said:
Who cares? Within one or two years he will be losing his house because he owes the IRS back taxes.

He could still make a comeback.
Click to expand...

Do you normally change your mind that fast? ;)

I think the guy needs more 18 year old hookers! A few more ought to do it. So much for screw AA I'm gonna treat myself BS.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom