SheHateMe
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2012
- 7,251
- 20
- 81
And unless that point is that that somehow makes what they are doing okay it is nothing more than a deflection.
You're being intentionally obtuse
And unless that point is that that somehow makes what they are doing okay it is nothing more than a deflection.
You're being intentionally obtuse
No, you are.
If you are going to say that illegal immigrants are not illegally entering the country, but instead illegally overstaying their visas your are implying that illegally overstaying their visas is somehow less bad.
Its pretty obvious that was NOT what he was implying in his post. You are being hostile for no reason, dude.
Nobody said anything about something being "less bad", only that it is ignorant to ignore that fact that many people in the US illegally did not sneak across the border. They came here legitimately and then decided to overstay their visas.
Illegal immigrant != A Mexican that stuck into Texas from Mexico.
Its pretty obvious that was NOT what he was implying in his post. You are being hostile for no reason, dude.
Nobody said anything about something being "less bad", only that it is ignorant to ignore that fact that many people in the US illegally did not sneak across the border. They came here legitimately and then decided to overstay their visas.
Illegal immigrant != A Mexican that stuck into Texas from Mexico.
You're being intentionally obtuse
Wrong the response was to the OP. Which made no mention to how illegals were violating immigration laws.
It is not ignorant to ignore the fact. Because it is irrelevant.
Illegal is illegal.
Yes, i am calling the Neo Nazi federation of retarded unemployed lazy cocksuckers known as the EDL retards.
"trying to stop sharia law"? That is cute.
Perhaps i should go to the US and start cracking skulls of Christians to "defend the US from the inquisition"?
You don't have a fucking clue what you are talking about. I get that you have read about sharia courts in England but these are not legal courts, these courts act like the Church of England in that if both parties agree on something it can guide them, it has no legality what so ever, neither the sharia courts nor the CoE courts.
Not that you'll read and understand that at all, you'll just hear "you admit you have sharia courts, EDL are the true freedom fighters just like when the Nazis fought the Jews".
I'm a third generation immigrant Jew, the EDL hates me more than they hate the Pakis that they buy their kebabs from using their welfare money. Not one person in the EDL has ever upheld a proper job and the overwhelming majority are convicted felons, the more convictions, the higher up they are.
FUCK the EDL, they are a disgrace.
So England does have sharia courts and the morons and pieces of shit called me crazy for that.
The EDL want to stop the radical Muslims from taking over. The EDL doesn't hate Jews, there are a tiny minority of neo-nazis who infiltrated the EDL but the EDL defends Jews and the other religions.
Here is some proof
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0qtjhaVgZY
WRONG, the OP is about wetbacks
Did you read the OP?![]()
Yes, broken English and all. :biggrin:
I'm just warning you about the "beautiful ray of sunshine" thing. You never know who hasn't seen that thread yet.
The Catholic church combines the worst elements of modern American liberalism and conservatism. They have Taliban-esque views on sex and birth control but sound like limp-wristed hippies on issues like immigration and capital punishment.
I think the world court should ban the US from calling any party liberals because a party that is ACTUALLY for individual liberty (classical liberalism) has never existed in action and the ones to proclaim it the most (tea party) are those who want to support it the least in action.
I can't think of another western nation that doesn't have an actual liberal party...
I doubt you will find any major party that is for actual individual liberty for everyone.
What a piece of shit. He needs to have his head examined and keep his mouth closed.
Why do you attack Christians for spreading the teachings of Christ, and attack their freedom of speech?
Why do you attack Christians for spreading the teachings of Christ, and attack their freedom of speech?

Where in the bible is stated you are allowed to invade other countries?
Or on the assumption the Jesus did not spend much time talking about international politics please point out where it said you were allowed to break into other people's houses and stay there. And if they try to kick you out they are in the wrong.![]()
Where in the bible is stated you are allowed to invade other countries?
Or on the assumption the Jesus did not spend much time talking about international politics please point out where it said you were allowed to break into other people's houses and stay there. And if they try to kick you out they are in the wrong.![]()
Don't use reverse psychology on him. He will explode.
