Kyro II vs. Geforce2 MX-400 vs. Geforce2 Ti200 vs. (insert your suggestion)

[DarrylLicke]

Thats me right about now....utterly boggled and over run with info.....being broke doesn't help options much either. Trust me when I say if I could I would get a GF3 Ti 200 (heard they were on sale at Best Buy recently) but again Iz broke.

HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[DarrylLicke]

PLONK!!!

Specs might help right...


733mhz PIII
using Voodoo5
256mb ram
P3V4X

 

[damocles]

If those are your options- Geforce 2 Ti without any doubt at all.

You can find good ones clocked at around 250/444 which will annihilate any Geforce 2 MX (especially at High res).

The Kyro needs a reasonably powerful CPU to get the most out of it, your P3 wouldn't be enough to feed it properly- Even with a grunty setup the Geforce 2 Ti would generally be a more powerful in any case

GF 2 Ti-hands down winner of the 3

 

[Smbu]

It would probably be best to keep using the V5 until you upgrade the the cpu/mobo, especially if you are broke like you said. That $99 GF3 Ti200 from BB would have been nice though. Better video cards usually need faster cpu's to take advantage of them.
I'm currently using a 64mb Visiontek GF3 Ti500(260/590) with my 1.4@1.6ghz Athlon XP 1600+ on a Shuttle AK31 KT266A mobo with 512mb of Crucial DDR.

 

[jcmkk]

I second the vote for the GF2 Ti

 

[CraigRT]

GeForce2 Ti.. that's like a GeForce2 Ultra.. which is a sweetass card even these days no doubt!

 

[Le Québécois]

I've tried the 3 of them on my P3 750Mhz( the old geforce2 MX, the Kyro2 and the old Geforce2 PRO. When I say old, it's because they are not the new models...MX400..or Gf2 Ti200, but if you look at Anand benchmarks...you'll see they're almost identical...BTW Yield, the Gf2 Ti 200 is a Gf2 PRO, not an Ultra, don't be fooled by it's 250Mhz.)

On my machine the fastest what without no doubt the Gf2 PRO.
On a 750Mhz the MX and the kyro2 are about the same...but the kyro has some artefact in lots of games.
So go for the Gf2 Ti 200.