Braxus, in my testing, an AMD XP Barton 2500+ in an AN35U / nf2 motherboard, dual-PC2700 (was better memory bandwidth than dual-3200), PCI gigE performance was at best 2/3 of P4 2.4/875 dual-PC3200 performance. I don't have a KT600 to test with, but a 1900+ in a MSI KT333-based board, single PC2100 was at best 1/3 of the modern Intel platform. CSA added a bit to the Intel platform's performance, but less than I expected (probably because we're talking about the difference between about 900Mb/s and 950Mb/s... as you get close to the peak it gets much harder to get that last bit of performance).
If absolute performance is important to you, the Intel 875P platform is your best bet.
If price/performance is important, the nf2 platform is better. (The Intel setup described cost about double what the AMD 2500+/nf2 setup cost)
No data on the KT600, but they have a known bad rep when it comes to PCI I/O performance.
Supposedly, nVidia's socket 939 A64 chipset will have a CSA-like integrated gigabit Ethernet on the north bridge. This might be interesting. However, nVidia's current Ethernet controller is good but not great in terms of performance, and nVidia are fairly free-OS hostile (no programming specs), so I'm not particularly waiting for this solution. Still, it's good to see that someone other than Intel sees that it's an interesting thing to do - Via, SiS, and ATI will likely follow suit.