Kroger manager fired after he slams a knife-wielding shoplifter to the ground

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
4-19-2014

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/oddnews...lding-shoplifter-to-the-ground-175837651.html

Kroger manager fired after he slams a knife-wielding shoplifter to the ground



If you’re an employee of a chain store and you see a shoplifter, don’t confront them. It’s been proven again and again and again and again that no matter how noble your intentions are, you can be fired from your job.



As KDFW FOX 4 News reports, this is exactly what happened to one Kroger grocery store manager in Arlington, Texas.




A customer in the parking lot of the Kroger recorded the incident on their cellphone. In the video, you can see the unnamed manager approach the shoplifting suspect.

The suspect appears to have a knife in his hand. The manager shoves him into a parked car and gets the knife out the suspect’s hand before eventually slamming him down to the ground.

The alleged shoplifter is 51-year-old Claude Medlock. According to KDFW, Arlington Police say that Mr. Medlock has a, “lengthy criminal history that includes theft and robbery convictions.” They didn’t consider the manager’s actions a crime, but that didn’t matter to Kroger. Kroger sent a statement to KDFW, which read in part:
“The incident…is not a reflection of our company’s fraud prevention protocol, procedures or training…He is no longer employed by our company.”
The manager told the station that he had worked in loss prevention for 13 years, and “believed he handled the situation properly.”
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
I am thinking the body slam after he got the knife away from him is what cost him his job. I probably would have done the same thing.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
I am thinking the body slam after he got the knife away from him is what cost him his job. I probably would have done the same thing.

No, pretty much anything even minor done to stop a shoplifter gets that person fired. It is disgusting.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
And probably sued.

Yea. What we need to do to solve this conflict is to provide laws that strongly favor the store employees over a convicted shoplifter. Then you don't have the monetary threat of a lawsuit.

I'd much rather we work towards that goal, rather than work towards the goal of enabling thieves. Why are you on the side of thieves?
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Too much liability on Krogers part. The manager could have sued Krogers as well if he had been injured in the altercation. That's why he was fired unfortunately.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
The shoplifter should have been killed because leaving him alive he may pull a gun out and start shooting.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
The shoplifter should have been killed because leaving him alive he may pull a gun out and start shooting.
That is exactly why most stores just say let em go and call the cops.

To not provoke them to begin with.

Didn't even watch it but what might have happened if the shoplifter did have a gun.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
Store managers do not come under the heading of law enforcement.

Let the shoplifter walk, call police, let them handle it, not like there were things being stolen that should maybe provoke a gun possibly being drawn and mass deaths.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
We live in a very litigious society.
Yes, we do.

Things like this happen in Florida a lot, letting em walk out and calling the cops is pretty much SOP here.

Works almost 100% of the time, as most stores have security cameras recording anything that happens in them.

Same thing as in bank robberies.
 
Last edited:

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Since he used to be loss prevention, that means he was probably deputized, and therefore allowed to subdue a suspect (99% of store employees are NOT allowed to do that).

However, he body slammed a disarmed and, from the looks of it, subdued suspect. LP or real cop, that's not allowed.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
Since he used to be loss prevention, that means he was probably deputized, and therefore allowed to subdue a suspect (99% of store employees are NOT allowed to do that).

However, he body slammed a disarmed and, from the looks of it, subdued suspect. LP or real cop, that's not allowed.

Loss prevention people are not deputized.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,912
4,947
136
The next time a shoplifter holds you at knife point, call the police. Wait for them to arrive. Let them deal with it.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
Kroger does not want someone thinking he's Rambo as a store manager more or less over loss of little money.

You don't confront them to begin with, so you won't be at knife point.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,406
136
Guys its not about lawsuits it is about employee safety. Again the guy means well but it is a risk businesses don't want to take over a few cans of soup or something similar.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,406
136
Loss prevention people are not deputized.

Actually in some locations they can. In Boston there are some very old laws that allow some loss prevention people to actually go to peoples residence, question them and actually apprehend them for the Police. They are effectively an extension of the local Police when dealing with store protection. I remember the old Jordan Marsh (not the Jordans furniture guys) were actually doing that going to suspects homes, talking about how they have the ability to arrest and generally badger people until stolen goods were returned.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
Actually in some locations they can. In Boston there are some very old laws that allow some loss prevention people to actually go to peoples residence, question them and actually apprehend them for the Police. They are effectively an extension of the local Police when dealing with store protection. I remember the old Jordan Marsh (not the Jordans furniture guys) were actually doing that going to suspects homes, talking about how they have the ability to arrest and generally badger people until stolen goods were returned.
They are doing it wrong then.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
Guys its not about lawsuits it is about employee safety. Again the guy means well but it is a risk businesses don't want to take over a few cans of soup or something similar.
It's about both more or less.

You'd have a hard time arguing against that one.
 

Murloc

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2008
5,382
65
91
it's a big company and this guy is just the manager, he could have let it go, and I'm sure that it's company policy as well. Getting an employee injured costs more than what a random hobo shoplifter can steal.

If you're just you and your shop, do whatever you want.