Originally posted by: maddogchen
Will that be admissible? i thought you can't bring in the victim's sex life
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: maddogchen
Will that be admissible? i thought you can't bring in the victim's sex life
I'm pretty sure 100% of all rape victims will not be having consensual sex within 12 hours of being raped
Originally posted by: Francesca
I don't know why it would be a "Slam dunk". Maybe the judge will let him off, but it's not as if that has anything to do with whether she was raped or not. Some women, in response to the trauma of rape will become sexually involved with someone to 'erase' the filthy feeling of the rape. It's a way to take back control and make sex normal again. It's not a common occurance. Most of the time a woman will feel the need to avoid touch. But just because it's not heard about often doesn't make it a valid reason behind her actions. As for being promiscuous, that's her choice. But I'm betting that she decided who she slept with and who she didn't.
It should never matter how many men a woman slept with if she's accused a man of rape. Just because she's slept with multiple men doesn't mean that she consented to sleep with that one that wouldn't take no for an answer.
Originally posted by: Francesca
I don't know why it would be a "Slam dunk". Maybe the judge will let him off, but it's not as if that has anything to do with whether she was raped or not. Some women, in response to the trauma of rape will become sexually involved with someone to 'erase' the filthy feeling of the rape. It's a way to take back control and make sex normal again. It's not a common occurance. Most of the time a woman will feel the need to avoid touch. But just because it's not heard about often doesn't make it a valid reason behind her actions. As for being promiscuous, that's her choice. But I'm betting that she decided who she slept with and who she didn't.
It should never matter how many men a woman slept with if she's accused a man of rape. Just because she's slept with multiple men doesn't mean that she consented to sleep with that one that wouldn't take no for an answer.
Just because its being alledged by the defense, doesn't make it true... It could very well be an attempt to smear the reputation of the victim...Originally posted by: DougK62
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: maddogchen
Will that be admissible? i thought you can't bring in the victim's sex life
I'm pretty sure 100% of all rape victims will not be having consensual sex within 12 hours of being raped
Yes - very suspicious if true.
FREE KOBE!
a common occurance? are you basing this off of studies or are you pulling facts out of your arse?
Except she's saying she did not have sex with anyone afterwards. f the defense team can prove that she is lieing about that her credibility is shot. It is her word against his, and she will have been proven a liar.
Originally posted by: Francesca
I don't know why it would be a "Slam dunk". Maybe the judge will let him off, but it's not as if that has anything to do with whether she was raped or not. Some women, in response to the trauma of rape will become sexually involved with someone to 'erase' the filthy feeling of the rape. It's a way to take back control and make sex normal again. It's not a common occurance. Most of the time a woman will feel the need to avoid touch. But just because it's not heard about often doesn't make it a valid reason behind her actions. As for being promiscuous, that's her choice. But I'm betting that she decided who she slept with and who she didn't.
It should never matter how many men a woman slept with if she's accused a man of rape. Just because she's slept with multiple men doesn't mean that she consented to sleep with that one that wouldn't take no for an answer.
Originally posted by: Francesca
Except she's saying she did not have sex with anyone afterwards. f the defense team can prove that she is lieing about that her credibility is shot. It is her word against his, and she will have been proven a liar.
Yeah, but someone could say that she lied because she thought that people would be closed minded and automatically assume that she wasn't raped just because of that incident. And let's face it, that is very much what would have happened and is happening in a lot of people's minds. The general public, and the jury, won't see it as a lie. They'll probably just focus on the sex itself and the timing of it.
Originally posted by: Francesca
Except she's saying she did not have sex with anyone afterwards. f the defense team can prove that she is lieing about that her credibility is shot. It is her word against his, and she will have been proven a liar.
Yeah, but someone could say that she lied because she thought that people would be closed minded and automatically assume that she wasn't raped just because of that incident. And let's face it, that is very much what would have happened and is happening in a lot of people's minds. The general public, and the jury, won't see it as a lie. They'll probably just focus on the sex itself and the timing of it.
Originally posted by: SinnerWolf
damnit, now he has to buy his wife another ring
Originally posted by: Francesca
Except she's saying she did not have sex with anyone afterwards. f the defense team can prove that she is lieing about that her credibility is shot. It is her word against his, and she will have been proven a liar.
Yeah, but someone could say that she lied because she thought that people would be closed minded and automatically assume that she wasn't raped just because of that incident. And let's face it, that is very much what would have happened and is happening in a lot of people's minds. The general public, and the jury, won't see it as a lie. They'll probably just focus on the sex itself and the timing of it.
Originally posted by: eakers
perhaps they need to bring kobes sex life into this too.
I hope the bitch gets nailed with a counter-suit and purgery.