kingston ssdnow v series 40gb raid 0

songokussm

Senior member
Jun 25, 2005
258
0
0
My plan was to buy the 25-m g2, however then kingston released his 40gb version. So i am thinking about getting 2 of them, and save 40 bucks and raiding them.

after reading this-
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/storage/2009/10/27/kingston-ssd-now-v-series-40gb-intel-x25-x/3

it seems like its a bad idea. So i would like to ask you all. What is the best/cheapest ssd thats at least 80gb? my max is 250ish (the intel x25-m g2 is 260.)

Secondly would it be more beneficial to just save up a few months and blow around 350 ?
to me the cost just doesn't justifiy the minor performance increase.
I am a student/gamer.
 

n7

Elite Member
Jan 4, 2004
21,281
4
81
I'd say stick with the 80 GB Intel G2 plan, or perhaps a 120 GB Indilinx if you want to spend a bit more.
 

n7

Elite Member
Jan 4, 2004
21,281
4
81
Not a RAID fan.
Write speeds are too crippled for my tastes.
That'd be why for me.

You'll find any Intel/Indilinx SSD a huge improvement from regular old HDDs :)

Anand basically recommends buying the size you need, & i agree.

Indilinx for 60/64 GB, Intel for 80 GB, Indilinx for 120/128 GB, Intel for 160 GB, Indilinx for 256 GB.

I suppose you could add the Kingstons @ the 40 GB size point.
 

pcslookout

Lifer
Mar 18, 2007
11,959
157
106
80 is my minimum, however 400 bucks for 120 just seems outrageous.

For the space maybe but once you feel the speed difference you will forget about the price tag. It is not that bad either. More than enough for the OS, Applications, and all the current games your playing. If your not a gamer even better!
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
7
81
My plan was to buy the 25-m g2, however then kingston released his 40gb version. So i am thinking about getting 2 of them, and save 40 bucks and raiding them.

I actually had the same thought, but decided against that. The reason is based on the design of the controller you get lower performance per drive, thus you would almost have to RAID them to get the performance of one bigger drive.

http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3667&p=4
Only 5 devices means the Intel controller works in 5-channel mode, instead of 10-channel like the X25-M G2
...
With only half the NAND flash of an 80GB X25-M (only five NAND devices on board), its sequential write speeds are cut in half

Basically these SSD controllers run the NAND in parallel - in RAID, if you want to think of it that way. Thus, cutting the number of channels in half just means you have to RAID two drives to get the same performance as with the full number of channels.
 

slayer202

Lifer
Nov 27, 2005
13,679
119
106
write speeds cut in half aren't too bad IMO. the read speeds are the real reason I am deciding to jump into SSD. for the price, the 40g kingston is good enough for me to start with. plus, hopefully TRIM support not too long from now.
 

n7

Elite Member
Jan 4, 2004
21,281
4
81
Whats the difference between the vertex and agility?

The Vertex uses Samsung chips; the Agility uses [slightly slower] Intel or Toshiba chips.

Difference is pretty minor, which is why i'd not get the Vertex unless it was only only a tiny bit more $$$ than the Agility.
 

slayer202

Lifer
Nov 27, 2005
13,679
119
106
I came here to make exactly the same thread. In my mind 2 Kingston 40s in Raid 0 mean an 80GB SSD with double the typical read speed and a regular write speed, is that correct? Because that seems like a hell of an SSD for $200 or so.

If there's a problem with that, what would you say is the cheapest SSD that's at least 60 GB that does not suck? This bit is kind of tricky to figure out.

I think the cheapest decent ones would be OCZ and supertalent, not sure exactly which models, but those brands have drives that will support TRIM I believe.
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
7
81
In my mind 2 Kingston 40s in Raid 0 mean an 80GB SSD with double the typical read speed and a regular write speed, is that correct? Because that seems like a hell of an SSD for $200 or so.

A hell of 80GB of SSD for $180 at Buy.com if you can catch them in stock. I just did a few hours ago. ^_^

Two in RAID 0 is double... two Kingston 40GB. Two Intel 80/160GB drives doubled would still be faster than the two 40GB doubled, however the two 40GB doubled is a bit faster than a single 80GB for less money.

The other thing to consider is that except for sequential writes, the 40GB Kingston beats a VelociRaptor in everything else by quite a bit. This is sequential reads, plus any type of random read/write. Sequential write performance is probably the least useful to a normal desktop system, while everything that it beats the VelociRaptor in is more useful to a normal desktop system.