Originally posted by: PastaPete
i'm glad i know how to appreciate the finer things in life.
Do you mean pasta?
Originally posted by: PastaPete
i'm glad i know how to appreciate the finer things in life.
Originally posted by: PastaPete
the way it was supposed to be enjoyed? the movie was drab, extra long, with 1 dimensional characters. it made the lines of dialogue in star wars seem more plausable.
i'm glad i know how to appreciate the finer things in life.
Originally posted by: zoiks
Originally posted by: PastaPete
i'm glad i know how to appreciate the finer things in life.
Do you mean pasta?
Originally posted by: PastaPete
Originally posted by: zoiks
Originally posted by: PastaPete
i'm glad i know how to appreciate the finer things in life.
Do you mean pasta?
sure. but not pasta, maccaroni.
Originally posted by: zoiks
Originally posted by: PastaPete
Originally posted by: zoiks
Originally posted by: PastaPete
i'm glad i know how to appreciate the finer things in life.
Do you mean pasta?
sure. but not pasta, maccaroni.
MacaroniPete?
Originally posted by: toekramp
fvckin' amazing movie, i can't even begin to comprehend how people on this board weren't blown away by it. I didn't think it was a minute too long.
Originally posted by: CasioTech
Originally posted by: johnjohn320
Originally posted by: CasioTech
On such an amazing movie? WTF? Is the search function not working for me? Too bad they edited out the part with him taking a dump and doing a #3. Yea, a #3.
I didn't like that jack black and a few others had no 30's english accent. It seems he just didn't try, acting like he would in something like Orange county.
I wanted more kong action sequences with more creatures, like the Rex's.
Kong's face had so many layers of animation in it, unlike anything I have ever seen before. Great job Industrial Light and Magic!
6/5, who could give it anyless?
a) a 30's english accent? The movie's set in America, genius (with American characters). People didn't talk that different 60-70 years ago.
b) More creatures? That was half the problem with the movie, there was too much at once! It was like sensory overload...only so many CG creatures one can digest at a time.
c) Yeah, Kong (and the other creatures, despite there being too many of them) were all damned impressive looking.
d) I'm sorry, I thought the movie was terrible. Too damn long-there were action scenes constantly, neverending stream to the point where you just don't really care anymore, and each of these scences went ON AND ON AND ON FOREVER. An hour and a half movie turned into 3 hrs, 7 minutes. Furthermore, (and yes, i recognize here that it's a fantasy movie) I just couldn't buy the plot. Obviously, a giant ape from "skull island" is not the part I'm referring to; I'm speaking about the characters' behavior, the sentiments of Kong, the reactions by people to certain events. I just all seemed ridiculous to me.
Oh well, 3 am. Time for bed.
EDIT-with reference to (b) and (d), my friend whom I saw the movie with described it perfectly: "It's just non-stop intensity, almost annoyingly so. It's like there's someone sitting next to you in the theater, just screaming his fscking head off at you for several hours."
I meant 30's AMERICAN accent. PPl did talk differently in the 30's.
i swear i am so glad that i am not so picky like 95% of ATOT, and that I can enjoy a movie for the way its supposed to be enjoyed, and not nit-pick at every part of the movie that is "not believable" or inconsistent ...
Originally posted by: Yossarian
you know what was cool, you could see Kong die in his eyes. that's pretty impressive for an animated character.
Originally posted by: johnjohn320
Originally posted by: CasioTech
Originally posted by: johnjohn320
Originally posted by: CasioTech
On such an amazing movie? WTF? Is the search function not working for me? Too bad they edited out the part with him taking a dump and doing a #3. Yea, a #3.
I didn't like that jack black and a few others had no 30's english accent. It seems he just didn't try, acting like he would in something like Orange county.
I wanted more kong action sequences with more creatures, like the Rex's.
Kong's face had so many layers of animation in it, unlike anything I have ever seen before. Great job Industrial Light and Magic!
6/5, who could give it anyless?
a) a 30's english accent? The movie's set in America, genius (with American characters). People didn't talk that different 60-70 years ago.
b) More creatures? That was half the problem with the movie, there was too much at once! It was like sensory overload...only so many CG creatures one can digest at a time.
c) Yeah, Kong (and the other creatures, despite there being too many of them) were all damned impressive looking.
d) I'm sorry, I thought the movie was terrible. Too damn long-there were action scenes constantly, neverending stream to the point where you just don't really care anymore, and each of these scences went ON AND ON AND ON FOREVER. An hour and a half movie turned into 3 hrs, 7 minutes. Furthermore, (and yes, i recognize here that it's a fantasy movie) I just couldn't buy the plot. Obviously, a giant ape from "skull island" is not the part I'm referring to; I'm speaking about the characters' behavior, the sentiments of Kong, the reactions by people to certain events. I just all seemed ridiculous to me.
Oh well, 3 am. Time for bed.
EDIT-with reference to (b) and (d), my friend whom I saw the movie with described it perfectly: "It's just non-stop intensity, almost annoyingly so. It's like there's someone sitting next to you in the theater, just screaming his fscking head off at you for several hours."
I meant 30's AMERICAN accent. PPl did talk differently in the 30's.
Just asked my grandfather about that one. His response: "not really." Maybe slang was different, but an accent? Don't think so. Just because Humphrey Bogart spoke a certain way in his movies doesn't mean that it was commonplace.
i swear i am so glad that i am not so picky like 95% of ATOT, and that I can enjoy a movie for the way its supposed to be enjoyed, and not nit-pick at every part of the movie that is "not believable" or inconsistent ...
A movie doesn't have to be accurate to a tee for me to enjoy it, it's always been the concept or bigger idea that counts. What I meant is that I don't like the "bigger concept" in this movie. Nearly everything about it just failed to draw me in. Doesn't make me a "nit-picky fsck" as you so eloquently put it. It's just a movie, and one that you had nothing to do with making AFAIK. No need to get all defensive over someone's opinion of it.
