Kindle Fire 7" reviews

SAWYER

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
16,742
42
91
http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/11/amazon-kindle-fire-hd-review-7-inch/

PROS
Great-looking IPS screen
Much-improved design
Strong WiFi performance
Extensive content selection
CONS
Occasionally sluggish performance
Constant sales pitches
BOTTOMLINE
Amazon's Kindle Fire HD is a big step forward over the original Fire, but still a little too customized to appeal to more serious tablet users.


Even if you step up and pay the extra $15 to disable Offers on your Kindle Fire HD, you can never and will never shake the feeling that this is less a tablet and more of a tool for shopping -- a Trojan Horse that's let into your home thanks to its low price and then unleashes a legion of must-buy items to completely compromise any walls you've built around your budget.

If you can get past that decidedly subsidized feeling, you do have a compelling package in your hands. The HD is fast, has a nice design, a beautiful screen, proper stereo speakers and, of course, oodles and oodles of premium content. For casual users looking for an inexpensive yet powerful tablet, the Kindle Fire HD should absolutely be at the top of your shopping list. But, for those looking to do more, and do more rapidly, the Nexus 7 is still the king of this diminutive hill.




http://www.theverge.com/2012/9/11/3317586/kindle-fire-hd-review-7-inch

7.5VERGE SCORE
GOOD STUFF
Terrific display
Ecosystem with Prime is outstanding
Faster performance all around
BAD STUFF
Software can be buggy and sluggish
App selection is still weak
For lean-back experiences only

There are two devices in this review. The first is something like an appliance — a window through which you casually view content, a way to listen to music, an e-reader for the train ride home. On that device, things like a big app selection or elaborate user experience take a back seat to content selection, price point, and simplicity. On that device, it's not about going toe-to-toe with the competition in every way (as Amazon seems to want to do), it's about offering a lot of fun stuff to consumers, and getting them to consume more. As that device, the Fire HD is a complete success. A marvel of bottom-line engineering and incredibly clever subsidies. It's a really, really good tablet for doing some very specific things.

But there's a second tablet in the review as well. One that gets compared to the iPad and Nexus 7. One that I expect to do more than just show me movies or help me shop. One that should be a companion for all kinds of things I want to do, that doesn't feel limited, that doesn't respond to my touches slowly, that doesn't make me wait.

As that device, the Fire HD still has a long way to go. I think it can get there, but it isn't there yet.
 

Piano Man

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2000
3,370
0
76
Seems like as far as Hardware goes, the FireHD > Nex7, but Amazon's walled garden forked Android OS is choking it.

I can't wait for someone to hack this thing so we can get the real deal on it (stock JellyBean). Once we that happens, I think these things will be a beast.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
How do they measure the screen, from bezel to bezel, or the actual screen? Because that sure looks like a LOT of bezel.
 

Ravynmagi

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2007
3,102
24
81
Nexus 7 is an amazing $200 tablet. But I have a few minor complaints about it. The screen is a bit washed out, storage capacity is limited, speaker is weak, no HDMI, and no 5GHz wifi. And the Kindle Fire HD addresses every one of those weak points.

My real concern is with the OS. I could probably live with with the ad on the lock screen and that tiny text ad at the bottom of the home screen and if not I don't mind paying $15 later to remove them. And the OS itself doesn't look too bad. However there are many apps I use that aren't in Amazon's Appstore, so being able to root and side loading Google Play is a must. If this can be done then I may strongly consider a Fire HD (though I'm sure as heck keeping my Nexus 7 too).

PS. And I should mention I'm an Amazon Prime Member, I read lots of ebooks, all from the Kindle Store and I watch Amazon Instant Videos. So I'm already big in the Amazon eco system. So this is primarily why I'd consider this tablet even though I have a Nexus 7. Amazon has intentionally gimped the Kindle app on Android and withheld Amazon Instant Video on Android for this very reason I'm sure.
 
Last edited:

dlock13

Platinum Member
Oct 24, 2006
2,806
2
81
You can side load the Google Play store on the original Fire. I don't see why you wouldn't be able to on this guy.

That would be the first thing I do if I were to get one. Side load Play store and then toss on Apex or Nova launcher (if possible).
 

Ravynmagi

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2007
3,102
24
81
You can side load the Google Play store on the original Fire. I don't see why you wouldn't be able to on this guy.

That would be the first thing I do if I were to get one. Side load Play store and then toss on Apex or Nova launcher (if possible).

There are rumors the new Fire HD might be more locked down and secure than the original Fire. I imagine the XDA people may eventually get around it, but if it's a pain in the ass, I don't want to bother.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
There are rumors the new Fire HD might be more locked down and secure than the original Fire. I imagine the XDA people may eventually get around it, but if it's a pain in the ass, I don't want to bother.

This is my biggest question about the new Fires, are they locked down? If not, then I'm definitely interested in the Fire HD. If its locked down, then I'll pass.
 

dlock13

Platinum Member
Oct 24, 2006
2,806
2
81
I do believe Amazon would lock it down because I know the first was locked down pretty good as well. However, it's only a matter of time with the community to root it and enable side loading correctly.

I'm not worried regardless. That thing will sell like hotcakes, and it will give Amazon a bunch more Prime subscribers. That is for sure.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
I do believe Amazon would lock it down because I know the first was locked down pretty good as well. However, it's only a matter of time with the community to root it and enable side loading correctly.

It was? Thought the first Fire was pretty open.
 

dagamer34

Platinum Member
Aug 15, 2005
2,591
0
71
It should have been pretty obvious that the Kindle Fire 7 HD was never going to be a good general purpose tablet not because of the specs, but because of how customized Amazon made it. However, its greatest strength is Google's greatest weakness, content. So the question is whether you favor Android tablet apps or Amazon content for something that costs $200. My guess is the latter because it's the only reason why all other Android tablets have failed (I consider the jury still out on the Nexus 7).
 

dlock13

Platinum Member
Oct 24, 2006
2,806
2
81

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
It should have been pretty obvious that the Kindle Fire 7 HD was never going to be a good general purpose tablet not because of the specs, but because of how customized Amazon made it. However, its greatest strength is Google's greatest weakness, content. So the question is whether you favor Android tablet apps or Amazon content for something that costs $200. My guess is the latter because it's the only reason why all other Android tablets have failed (I consider the jury still out on the Nexus 7).

For apps, the Play Store handily trounces Amazon's tiny walled garden. Even for books and magazines, you've got the Play Store, Amazon's Kindle App, B&N's Nook app, and a plethora of smaller free book store apps. There's not exactly a shortage of video rental/streaming apps either. Its just more scattered.

Publishers are scared of the medium of the future though. :( Content is slowly filtering through though.