zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 110,597
- 29,230
- 146
Not announcing it immediately was a non-starter for the reasons already given. The decision wasn't so that the administration could "take credit" for it. They were going to take credit for it whether they did so immediately or several weeks later. The issue was that too many people wouldn't believe it had it been announced retrospectively, and without a doubt it would have leaked out to the general public through one channel or another, probably within days. The administration needed to get on top of the story before it leaked.
The botching of the details by people making unauthorized leaks is hardly surprising, though the administration should have done a better job in controlling that. Still, these new revelations hardly stimulate conspiracy theories. So they landed on the roof instead of the ground, and the helicopter crashed after OBL was killed rather than before? The fact that someone on the ground, who is actually accusing the administration of getting many of the details wrong, is corroborating this kill is not exactly a positive development for the CT crowd.
- wolf
This author is not someone who was on the ground, simply an "insider" with more privileged access to a source that was on the ground, which is pretty much what the NYorker article claims.
So, that article has been challenged, by this book, which claims the same secondary (or tertiary) level of access. :\