Right, but you're just pointing out the other side of Craig's coin. His point was valid in this case. It's bad enough that a kid is unjustly expelled. People shouldn't be generalizing from this sort of extreme incident. It's like people who drew sweeping conclusions about the criminal justice system based on the OJ case.
lol @ Australia's Aborigine treatment.
That's the best you've go? Hahahah.
If the only way you can attack us is to bring up shit that happened 50 years ago, then I think we're doing ok.
Actually still til this day. I have met hundreds of Australians and of all the peoples I have met they seem to have a larger majority than most of racist assholes.
That's the best you've go? Hahahah.
If the only way you can attack us is to bring up shit that happened 50 years ago, then I think we're doing ok.
http://www.chinapost.com.tw/asia/australia/2009/08/17/220873/UN-probes.htmUpdated Monday, August 17, 2009 3:19 pm TWN, By ROD McGUIRK, AP
UN probes Aboriginal discrimination allegations
One of the coalition groups, Australians for Native Title and Reconciliation, or ANTAR, said it wanted Anaya to insist that human rights principles as set out in the U.N. Convention Against Racial Discrimination be applied.
The legislation that allows the so-called intervention suspended aspects of racial discrimination laws so measures could specifically target Aboriginal communities, enraging some activists who said this was unfair and breached the U.N. declaration on the rights of indigenous people.
AMTAR called on the government to reinstate federal anti-discrimination laws without "special measures."
Indigenous Affairs Minister Jenny Macklin's spokeswoman Jessica Walker said Monday the government planned to introduce legislation to the parliament in October to reinstate anti-discrimination laws.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-08-17/un-probes-human-rights-in-aboriginal-camps/1393108UN probes human rights in Aboriginal camps
Brigid Glanville for AM
Updated August 17, 2009 10:33:00
More than 3,000 letters from Indigenous people and community groups will be presented to Professor Anaya, detailing concerns the intervention is racially discriminatory.
David Cooper, from the Australians for Native Title and Reconciliation (ANTAR), says Australia has breached part of the UN's declaration of the rights of Indigenous peoples, and not just in relation to the Northern Territory Intervention.
I did not know 2009 was 50 years ago...interesting. That would mean Obama has violated the "no more than 10 years as president" rule!!!!!
In case you did not know, in 2009, the Australian government suspended anti-discrimination laws, but only regarding the Aborigines, so they could control what the Aborigines can own, watch, drink, etc.
http://www.chinapost.com.tw/asia/australia/2009/08/17/220873/UN-probes.htm
And just in case you say China is a bad source of info about the region around them:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-08-17/un-probes-human-rights-in-aboriginal-camps/1393108
That's some solid data you have there buddy...
That's some solid data you have there buddy...
Australia is not better/worse.
The thing I don't like about this story - which may or may not be an outrageously poor judgement by the school depending how much of the story we got - is that the only reason most will give it more attention is that it has an underlying message of 'see, charges of racism are all nonsense!', which is a lie, and harmful.
Analogously, it's like people who are hateful of women and prefer 'the old days' of little enforcement of rape laws might love to talk about a woman who lies about rape.
He's not wrong which is why I used "also" but there's more to it than either point. Yes the child was harmed and yes this will distract from incidents as you say but IMO a major reason that many feel as he says is precisely because of the mentality which caused this boy to be expelled. This incident perpetuates racial tension, not diffuses it and that is why I said we need to grow up.
Let's get back to this case in particular. What did the boy learn? That there are those who look at him and because he is white and makes a casual comment he can be punished. What did the girl learn? She has power to ruin people by mere suggestion. That's not a lesson schools should be teaching. I hope the parents sue the policy makers and win a fortune.
FTFYThis is what happens when you have progressives in charge who follow their perverse "zero-tolerance" ideology to the T without consideration the circumstances around an event.
Yep. And in their defense, the Aborigines are having a horrible time with the influx of western culture. They are not melding with it well, and it is destroying them.
I don't know what Australia can do, the alcoholism and rape is rampant. In the US, the American Indian tribal leaders banned alcohol from almost every reservation in an attempt to combat the effects of it. Not sure if the Aborigines have the same type of system where the tribal leaders are respected lawgivers.
If they banned Alcohol it would help them. Alot of ethnic groups/races cant digest Alcohol and they seem to go "Crazy" when drinking it. Native Americans and Australian Abos have just about zero tolerance for Alcohol and 1 can of budweiser is like drinking 5 shots of whiskey to those groups.
So its not that Abo's are Alcoholics, the issue is that genetically they cant handle any at all. Even 1 can [seriously]. Also its not Western Culture's fault either. Western people had no idea, until VERY recently that Alcohol tolerance was on a genetic level and that some groups could not handle a drop of it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohol_tolerance
Alcohol tolerance in different ethnic groups
""The tolerance to alcohol is not equally distributed throughout the world's population, and genetics of alcohol dehydrogenase indicate resistance has arisen independently in different ethnic groups.[2] People of European descent on average have a high alcohol tolerance and are less likely to develop alcoholism compared to Aboriginal Australians, Native Americans and some East Asian groups.[3][4][5] This is related to an average higher body mass, but also to the prevalence of high levels of alcohol dehydrogenase in the population.[6][7] The high alcohol tolerance in Europeans and some other ethnic groups has probably evolved as a consequence of centuries of exposure to alcohol in established agricultural societies.[8][2]
Not all differences in tolerance can be traced to biochemistry.[9] Differences in tolerance levels are also influenced by socio-economic and cultural difference including diet, average body weight and patterns of consumption.[10][11]
An estimated one out of three people in East Asian countries have an alcohol flush reaction, colloquially known as "Asian Glow", a condition where the body cannot break down ingested alcohol completely because it lacks the genetically coded enzyme that performs this function in the bodies of drinkers with "European" tolerance levels.[12] Flushing, or blushing, is associated with the erythema (reddening caused by dilation of capillaries) of the face, neck, and shoulder, after consumption of alcohol.[12]""
Europeans [White people] are the de facto best drinkers since Alcohol has been common in Europe for thousands of years. We can say Black people dominate sports ? Yep. Well Whiteys dominate downing a Jack Daniels.![]()
