• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Kia Stinger quick review

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Test-drove a Kia Stinger ($30 - $50k Kia sports sedan). Thoughts:

1. It's both bigger & smaller than I expected. It is a GT, after all, but with how much people talked about the large-ish size, I was expecting something like Lincoln-size, haha.
2. Very low to the ground, both the ground clearance & the car itself. I was surprised. Still a decent size, but it's like the first time you see a lambo & realize just how small they are IRL.
3. As expected, rear visibility is awful. Rear quarter was pretty mediocre too.
4. Trunk is freakin' ginormous.
5. Power is crazy. Really really really fun. 375HP twin-turbo V6 (turbo 4 also available, haven't tested yet).
6. Available in automatic only, no stick.
7. The 8-speed is Kia's own transmission iirc. It is really good. Best non-6-speed auto I've driven, by far. No lurching issues & I didn't notice any annoying gear-hunting or anything.
8. You really have to push down on the pedal to get it to move, unless you put it on sports mode.
9. It was roomy, although my legs were snug. 50/50 on my knee issue...kind of bothered me knee on the right side, but didn't hurt it.
10. Seats were pretty dang comfortable. Decent room in the back seats, too.
11. All of the colors look much better in person than they do in the photos. The concrete (light gray) is actually pretty nice in-person, it's almost like a matte concrete color with a clearcoat on it - no metallic in it, I guess is what I'm trying to say. The blue actually looks great in person. Red wasn't my favorite, but definitely made the understated design pop out more.
13. HUD was great.
14. Brakes were really excellent (Brembro).

I like the idea of the car - AWD, powerful, sedan, sleeper design, good driving experience. Price is definitely sticker shock for a Kia, although thousands less than its competitors (if you don't mind the badge). The AWD seems nice, although the car is pretty low & the overall car itself (body-wise) is low, so I'd be curious to see how it fares in heavy snow.

Quick tangent, sat in a Cadenza - pretty nice, great sounding engine too. Also checked out the Niro (Kia's version of a Prius) - I fit in it surprisingly well!
 
I don't get it why car makers make powerful cars so that you need to push throttle down hard. It should have insane amount of torque at any rpm.
 
I don't get it why car makers make powerful cars so that you need to push throttle down hard. It should have insane amount of torque at any rpm.

tbh, it was annoying. I didn't try Sport mode, so I don't know how the throttle response actually feels in that mode.

It's a cool car, but I don't think it's for me.
 
I don't get it why car makers make powerful cars so that you need to push throttle down hard. It should have insane amount of torque at any rpm.

Electronic throttle control is so annoying. I'm never quite sure how much thrust I'm going to get out of a given throttle input. It makes it really hard to trust the car.
 
Any thoughts on Kia Rio Hatchback?
Friend of mine has a 2016 Kia Rio.
It's comfortable, it is slow, but can still cruise on the highway at 80 or 90 comfortably. He claims it has excellent fuel economy. It's not "exciting", but, it seems like an efficient and reasonable commuter.
 
I don't get it why car makers make powerful cars so that you need to push throttle down hard. It should have insane amount of torque at any rpm.

It would be more annoying if, every time I pressed the accelerator pedal the tiniest bit, the throttle opened up all the way. I'm not going to accidentally push the pedal to the firewall because my calf itches.

And it takes time for engines/turbos to rev to produce power. (YMMV depending on engine.)

Most every car is going to be in between the extremes, perfect for somebody and not quite right for everybody else.
 
I don't see anything wrong with this. Any vehicle in this category is going to have different drive modes with altered throttle mapping. I personally feel that normal drive modes should be more casual and then you can switch into your sport or sport + modes to get your more aggressive maps.
 
Why not get a Ford Focus 1.0L Ecoboost sedan? Should find em for $6K or more off MSRP new.

Uses the 6AT not the DCT, so no transmission issues.
I would think very carefully before doing that. My impression from the tests that I have read is that the turbo 1.0L is not really a very desirable engine. Slow *and* gets only slightly better mileage than the 2.0 liter. How did we get from the Stinger to Rios and Focuses (Foci?) though?
 
Back
Top