Originally posted by: ProfJohn
After hearing all you people complain about how all I do is defend Bush and follow the party line it is fun watching you all do the same thing for Kerry now.
Since this story broke it is has been a non-stop defend Kerry-a-thon by some of you. First you said he must have misspoke, then you repeated the Kerry line that it was as bad joke, then you started with the ?he apologized? lines.
After doing nothing by attacking me and a few others for daring to defend Bush you are now falling over each other to defend Kerry. Sort of shows that all your attacks on me and the other Bush defenders were as hollow as we expected. It is all about politics and nothing else. Now that it is your guy who looks bad you are doing exactly what you claimed you hate me for doing.
Here's the difference: we're telling the truth. The attacks against Kerry are a lie.
Deal with that; you have no rational argument against it.
Do you see one person here saying "Kerry didn't botch the joke, he did it just right!", or, "Kerry had a great delivery, hilarious!"?
No, you don't - that would be bias, spin, the things we attack for.
When we criticize Bush for, say, his joking about not finding WMD under the couch in the oval office, as tasteless and inappropriate, defending him on that would be 'spin'.
On the other hand, take the following actual Bush quote:
?Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.?
Now, the democrats have just as good an argument that Bushreally just admitted being a traitor and trying to harm the country as you do that Kerry was insulting the troops.
But you don't see democrats make that argument - they say Bush misspoke and said something embarrassing, which would have been a legitimate comment on Kerry.
If you did see someone claim Bush really meant he's trying to harm the nation, you could then defend Bush and I don't think virtually any liberals here would attack you for it.
The liberals here are not showing bias in defending Kerry, other than a bias for the truth.