As a Christmas gift, I got a Steelseries Siberia 800 headset. It's a nice headset, and is just about capable of everything I want to do...just about. Couple of things I don't know about it, and complaints I saw while researching it further:
--It's a wireless headset, but it requires you to wire the headset to a console controller. This isn't terrible, but for the price, I'd like that map to just do the dirty work and leave the controllers alone.
--Tom's Hardware said the headset's limited on audio ports, meaning someone like myself (owner of a PC, XB1S, and a PS4P to use with the headset), there's either an audio quality sacrifice or a requirement that I rewire stuff all the time. That's irritating.
--Some reviews complained that the mic on the 800s is pretty quiet, with one noting he had to meaningfully speak up at time with it. I might not have a problem here, but again, the price tag essentially requires I don't have a problematic mic.
Those are the main things. So, it then leaves me wondering--if the thing's "totally wireless" existence means I'm still wiring my headset to the XB1 and/or PS4 controller, how wireless is it, REALLY? I haven't gotten to see what the cost of a return with this thing it, and that might just make the whole thing moot (if they want something like $30 for return shipping, I'll live with an overpriced, high-quality headset, rather than eat the $30 and get something else).
The alternatives I've considered, with some reading, are either the Arctis 7, also from Steelseries, or Logitech's G933. That's talking about replacing a $240 headset with one that's $140-150. If all 3 end up meaning a wireless headset that's imperfect, then I might prefer to save $100 or so and compromise a little more. The Arctis apparently has the same audio guts as the Siberia, just no amp, but I can live with that (depending on how well it plays with the various devices). Same for the G933--if it isn't a major hassle to switch devices, I will take the pricing over the notoriety of the Siberia.
It just seems like the Siberias are priced high for being flexible and incredibly capable. However, once that starts turning into the same cable-fumbling mess I'm trying to avoid, I'm not sure what I'm even paying for with the things. When the Arctis is $100 less, comes with the same headphones, and still is capable of playing with every device, it's hard to justify the Siberias just for an amp. I'm not sure what else the 800s offer, beyond that and the pair of batteries.
Anyone have/tried these 3 headsets, or have another suggestion (no, thanks, on the $300 A50s!)?
--It's a wireless headset, but it requires you to wire the headset to a console controller. This isn't terrible, but for the price, I'd like that map to just do the dirty work and leave the controllers alone.
--Tom's Hardware said the headset's limited on audio ports, meaning someone like myself (owner of a PC, XB1S, and a PS4P to use with the headset), there's either an audio quality sacrifice or a requirement that I rewire stuff all the time. That's irritating.
--Some reviews complained that the mic on the 800s is pretty quiet, with one noting he had to meaningfully speak up at time with it. I might not have a problem here, but again, the price tag essentially requires I don't have a problematic mic.
Those are the main things. So, it then leaves me wondering--if the thing's "totally wireless" existence means I'm still wiring my headset to the XB1 and/or PS4 controller, how wireless is it, REALLY? I haven't gotten to see what the cost of a return with this thing it, and that might just make the whole thing moot (if they want something like $30 for return shipping, I'll live with an overpriced, high-quality headset, rather than eat the $30 and get something else).
The alternatives I've considered, with some reading, are either the Arctis 7, also from Steelseries, or Logitech's G933. That's talking about replacing a $240 headset with one that's $140-150. If all 3 end up meaning a wireless headset that's imperfect, then I might prefer to save $100 or so and compromise a little more. The Arctis apparently has the same audio guts as the Siberia, just no amp, but I can live with that (depending on how well it plays with the various devices). Same for the G933--if it isn't a major hassle to switch devices, I will take the pricing over the notoriety of the Siberia.
It just seems like the Siberias are priced high for being flexible and incredibly capable. However, once that starts turning into the same cable-fumbling mess I'm trying to avoid, I'm not sure what I'm even paying for with the things. When the Arctis is $100 less, comes with the same headphones, and still is capable of playing with every device, it's hard to justify the Siberias just for an amp. I'm not sure what else the 800s offer, beyond that and the pair of batteries.
Anyone have/tried these 3 headsets, or have another suggestion (no, thanks, on the $300 A50s!)?