• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Karl Rove: Hillary Clinton may have brain damage

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
IronWing said:
Nah, we're going to tax the shit out of you. Tax, tax, tax. Do a happy tax dance on your neck we will. We still have to pay for the wars you conservatives started.

BTW, you still leveraging your house to play the markets?
Click to expand...

You're a poet and didn't know it.:thumbsup: 🙂
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
We'll get to that but...



Wow dude. "Did her husband". That's pretty sexist. Hillary may or may not be a lot of things, but when did she ever follow quietly behind waiting for his permission and by how many steps? Bill's long gone and never her master.

Here is where Rove and Hillary can find common ground. She and he are quite the match.




A sterling endorsement. We'd have been up not to our neck in Afghanistan, but completely under if she had her way. Petraeus... what can one say about an endorsement from him? The real scandal

So what do people who have a demonstrated history of not being right wing shills have to say? How about Glenn Greenwald? From the first link-



Selling Greenwald as Rove's flunkie is going to be a tough one to pull off.
Click to expand...

Really? Glen Greenwald? The far-left whacko? Now he's an authority?
She supported taking out Bin Laden, which I totally agree with, not letting him get away like Bush did.
You've been drinking the kool-aid for too long, I think you've lost it.
 
sportage said:
Well Im not an Neurologist, But theres a difference between brain damage and drain injury.
A brain injury does not necessarily and seldom will lead to brain damage.
If that were the case with Hillary's fall, she'd be wearing those glasses the rest of her life.
Obviously, she no longer needs the glasses.
Do we REALLY need to discuss his statement as fact? Considering the source as Karl Rove.
And why is it making any serious news anyway?
I picked up on it as the laugh of the day.

You wouldn't call someone hat fell and broke an arm, then needing a cast, you wouldn't call that person handicapped. Maybe Karl would.
I suppose being a republican, Karl doesn't believe in the body healing itself anymore than climate change can affect weather.

And as Karl has now proven to all, you do not necessarily need to fall to have actual brain damage, now do you Karl?

You have to ask yourself just who is Karl Rove anyway?
Who is he? What is he?

He got GW elected by terrorizing their base with the homosexual takeover.
And he believed Obama lost the 2012 election.

And there you have the total sum of Karl Rove in a nut shell.
Oh... did i say nut? 😀
Click to expand...

The way I read it Karl Rove Rove never said brain "damage", he said brain "injury".

So, I guess you're now a Karl Rove supporter since you agree with him?

BTW: The the thread title is incorrect.

Fern
 
So a spokesperson for Hillary says, ”She is 100 per cent. Period.” The last time a Democrat ended a proclamation that way it turned out to be the lie of the year.
 
Fern said:
The way I read it Karl Rove Rove never said brain "damage", he said brain "injury".

So, I guess you're now a Karl Rove supporter since you agree with him?

BTW: The the thread title is incorrect.

Fern
Click to expand...

Yea, I saw that spin. Fred Astair had nothin on him.
 
Karl Rove......Karl Christian Rove.....my, my my. If ever there was an indictment of the American political system and the kind of people it takes to have that system exist in its present form, he would be the definitive evidence of why it is so corrupt and rife with lies, shady backdoor dealings and where money and power meld to create the Frankenstein of a political system we have to rely on for our existence as a nation.

F'in bastards. Da' Fuk?
 
she was damage goods before the whack on the head. evidence of that is the fact she is the most cheated on woman in the world and the epitome of denial.
 
spidey07 said:
Let's just go with she's always been a brain dead fuck.

I mean, at this point, what difference does it make?
Click to expand...

Let's just go with you supporting any line of shit that reinforces your delusions. It's a remarkable feat keeping your nose in the ass crack of guys like Rove when they perform the political equivalent of a triple Lutz.

Or maybe it's just the born yesterday selective memory syndrome so common among eager middle class consumers of right wing emotional pablum.
 
marincounty said:
Really? Glen Greenwald? The far-left whacko? Now he's an authority? She supported taking out Bin Laden, which I totally agree with, not letting him get away like Bush did. You've been drinking the kool-aid for too long, I think you've lost it.
Click to expand...
There is a reason Bush didnt kill Bin Laden... it is because bin laden was NOT behind the attacks on 9/11/01.

I cant believe Obama is going to get away with saying bin laden was killed under his admin. i wish virginia was going to try him for treason for lying his ass off like that.
 
Last edited:
Anarchist420 said:
There is a reason Bush didnt kill Bin Laden... it is because bin laden was NOT behind the attacks on 9/11/01.

I cant believe Obama is going to get away with saying bin laden was killed under his admin. i wish virginia was going to try him for treason for lying his ass off like that.
Click to expand...
I can't believe you're even functional enough to turn on a computer sometimes 🙂
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top