Kansas considers removing Obama from ballot

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
The people upset about obama not being put on the ballot are hypocrites, where were they when Ron Paul and his delegates were being removed?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earth to Incorruptable, if Ron Paul in only the GOP Primary, got defrauded by the GOP, is purely a GOP issue. But when Obama won the same democratic primary with a far larger number of ballots, no one is charging fraud on the democratic primary side of the Kansas ballot.

But earth to Incorruptible, we are now talking the 2012 General election and birthers who been shot down by Scotus, who have no legitimate leg to stand on in trying to remove the Obama name from General election ballot at the last minute leaving insufficent time for courts to act.

As for Ron Paul, if he had legitimate alledged grievances, he had his chance to challenge Romney and GOP fraud in court and DID NOT.

So like the birthers and Ron Paul, all they do is whine whine whine and whine some more because they know they don't stand a chance in the courts of this nation and in the court of public opinion either. Because in States where popular votes and not caucus states Ron Paul never got enough popular votes in only the GOP primaries to matter. But in caucus states, PaulBots found they could pack a few caucuses and then try to generalize that up to Statewide support Ron Paul could never achieve in only GOP primaries.

Maybe Gary Johnson, the Libertarian party official standard bearer can get enough popular votes in the 2012 election, to guarantee the Libertarian party a place on the general election printed ballot in 2016. But why don't we on this forum see you, Incorruptable, crying with equal vigor about GOP efforts to keep Gary Johnson off the general election printed ballot in all 50 states in 2012?
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,352
11
0
The people upset about obama not being put on the ballot are hypocrites, where were they when Ron Paul and his delegates were being removed?

Why don't you start a new thread instead of trying to derail this one with your strawman false equivalences?
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
Oh please please do, because if Kansas idiots remove Obama's name from the printed Kansas ballot, the only remaining alternative will be to discard all Kansas votes and their electorial college votes from the 11/2012 general election totals.

Why would this have to happen?
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Why would this have to happen?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because Ballots have to printed well in advance of the general election, and if courts can't intervene quickly enough its the only remaining fair way.