We have briefly discussed this on the SKL/CFL thread.
While the TDP numbers do fit with the old KBL-G rumors, this time the roadmap makes a clear distinction in that it openly mentinons the separation of chips - KBL-H + dGFX. In the light of the old SKU rumors and the way Intel would want to market their product, it would make little sense for them to start mentioning the EMIB based product as two different chips. Why go through the trouble to begin with?
On top of that, the top Hades NUC comes with a 7xxx
K chip, which is an unlocked part. Why would Intel build this test package and allow overclocking? That would make power management even more difficult to handle.
I think there's a good chance this is a classic combo of CPU + dGPU, possibly based on MXM boards like Arachnotronic
already mentioned.
The Skull Canyon NUC goes for $1000 if you spec the system out. This would cost at least that, if not more.
As an interesting side note, even though expensive when compared with DYI mini systems and even notebooks, the Skull Canyon NUC was offered for a good price when compared with similar systems from OEMs. They simply go crazy when it comes to these small factor units and ask for ridiculous prices.
The only exception to this rule that I've seen so far is the Asrock DeskMini 110 barebone which comes at a very appealing price in Europe too and is probably the cheapest and most effective way way to build a compact small factor PC. Points to
VirtualLarry for spotting it early on.