Originally posted by: zerocool84
What about AEM dryflow filters???
They flow less, but filter better than a K&N.
But a stock or mildly-modified engine can't use more air than the stock filter will already let flow.
That's my, and lots of other folks' point. Unless you're modified your engine to make a LOT more power than stock, your factory air filter already flows more than enough.
Anyone who puts a drop-in K&N filter and thinks they see a difference in either power or gas mileage is simply imagining things. Too many variables....was the stock filter really dirty? If so, then replacing it with ANY filter might have yielded increases in mileage/power.
Gas mileage claims are really irrelevant, anyway....first off, they aren't scientific, done in controlled conditions so everything is apples to apples....and secondly, and most importantly.......people lie.
If you buy something for your car that's supposed to make a difference, and it's a lot more expensive than the stock component, you can bet you're going to think there's a difference, and you can also bet that most people won't admit it even if they realize there isn't a difference.
Good analogy: K&N and Monster Cables. Both certainly work, but neither are necessary and both are overpriced....and at least Monster Cables don't allow potentially harmful stuff into your speakers.
😉
Good independent test of K&N vs paper filters