Justice Department Moves Toward Charges Against Contractors in Iraq

KGB

Diamond Member
May 11, 2000
3,042
0
0

By Del Quentin Wilber and Karen DeYoung
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, August 17, 2008; Page A01

Federal prosecutors have sent target letters to six Blackwater Worldwide security guards involved in a September shooting that left 17 Iraqi civilians dead, indicating a high likelihood the Justice Department will seek to indict at least some of the men, according to three sources close to the case.

The guards, all former U.S. military personnel, were working as security contractors for the State Department, assigned to protect U.S. diplomats and other non-military officials in Iraq. The shooting occurred when their convoy arrived at a busy square in central Baghdad and guards tried to stop traffic.

An Iraqi government investigation concluded that the security contractors fired without provocation. Blackwater has said its personnel acted in self-defense.

The sources said that any charges against the guards would likely be brought under the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act, which has previously been used to prosecute only the cases referred to the Justice Department by the Defense Department for crimes committed by military personnel and contractors overseas. Legal experts have questioned whether contractors working for the State Department can be prosecuted under its provisions.

The sources cautioned that prosecutors are still weighing evidence gathered in a 10-month investigation that began shortly after the shootings. A federal grand jury has heard testimony from about three dozen witnesses since November, including U.S. and Blackwater officials and Iraqis, according to two of the sources.

Target letters, often considered a prelude to indictment, offer suspects the opportunity to contest evidence brought before the grand jury and give their own version of events. The letters were sent this summer, although the sources, who agreed to discuss the case only on the condition of anonymity because of its sensitivity, said a final decision on whether to indict may not be made until October, about a year after the incident.

The U.S. attorney's office in Washington and the Justice Department's National Security Division are leading the investigation. Channing Phillips, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office, declined to comment, as did Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd. A spokeswoman for the FBI's Washington field office, which investigated the shooting on the ground in Iraq in the weeks after the incident, also declined to comment.


Anne E. Tyrell, a spokeswoman for North Carolina-based Blackwater, said that the company believes the guards fired their weapons "in response to a hostile threat" and is monitoring the investigation closely.

"If it is determined that an individual acted improperly, Blackwater would support holding that person accountable," Tyrell said in a statement. "But at this stage, without being able to review evidence collected in an ongoing investigation, we will not prejudge the actions of any individual. The company is cooperating fully with ongoing investigations and believes that accountability is important."

Earlier reports on the investigation indicated that the FBI had focused on three Blackwater guards among a larger but unknown number present at the time of the Sept. 16 incident in Baghdad's Nisoor Square. None has been publicly identified, and authorities did not say which six received the target letters.

The shooting, and the perceived failure to hold anyone accountable for it, has fueled congressional dissatisfaction with the government's use of private security contractors in a combat zone. Contractors working for the Defense Department are now explicitly liable for crimes under laws covering the military, but several efforts in Congress to extend that jurisdiction to State Department contractors have failed.

The incident also angered Iraqi political leaders. U.S. contractors have been exempt from Iraqi law under a decree imposed by the U.S. occupation administration in 2003.

Seeking to respond to widespread fury among Iraqis over the Nisoor Square incident, the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki insisted in negotiations over a new bilateral security agreement with the United States that all contractors come under Iraqi legal jurisdiction. Facing pressure to finalize an agreement by the end of the year, the Bush administration agreed to meet the Iraqi demand, according to officials close to the discussions. But the administration continues to insist on immunity from Iraqi law for military and official Defense Department personnel, the officials said.

Blackwater is one of three U.S. security firms under contract with the State Department to provide personal security in Iraq. The State Department in May extended Blackwater's contract for another year, saying that while the case was still under investigation it had no enforceable cause to cancel it.

Lawyers for the Blackwater guards have argued in ongoing discussions with prosecutors that the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act, known as MEJA, can be applied only to contractors working for the Defense Department, two sources said. That position appeared to be buttressed by the Congressional Budget Office, which said in a report on contractors in Iraq released last week that MEJA "does not apply to civilians working . . . for federal departments or agencies other than DOD [the Department of Defense]."

Legislative proposals to extend MEJA's provisions beyond the Defense Department -- which have been repeatedly opposed by the White House -- have made the same point.

But the question has never been tested in court. Some outside legal experts said that prosecutors would be able to make a compelling argument that MEJA covers Blackwater guards involved in the shooting under a 2005 amendment that expanded MEJA's provisions to include contractors "supporting the mission of the Department of Defense."

"You are dealing with a military environment," said Scott Silliman, a law professor at Duke University who specializes in national security matters. "If the contractors were not there, those State Department folks would be guarded by the military. Prosecutors could argue to the judge that those facts fit within the definition of furthering the [Defense Department] mission in Iraq."

Among other possible complications in potential legal action against the Blackwater contractors are interviews some of the guards gave to officials from the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security immediately after the incident. The interviews were conducted under legal protections against self-incrimination granted to government employees, and the guards were informed that they could not be used by FBI investigators or in a potential prosecution.

Several former prosecutors and defense attorneys said that the government would have a difficult time proving the case even if it overcame the jurisdictional question. They noted the hurdles facing prosecutors in domestic police shooting cases, adding that such cases are exceedingly hard to win.

Trying to convince jurors that guards committed a crime by opening fire in a war zone "makes it an exponentially tougher case to prove" than a bad police shooting, said George Parry, a former federal and state prosecutor in Pennsylvania who handled law enforcement shootings as a prosecutor and defense attorney. Parry does not represent anyone in the Blackwater matter.

The former prosecutors and defense attorneys said defense lawyers would work hard to put jurors inside the war zone and portray the guards as having to make split-second decisions in an environment where insurgents dress like civilians and attacks could occur anywhere, at any moment. Witnesses in such situations also often contradict each other, and evidence gathered in Baghdad may not meet the same forensic standards that jurors are used to seeing in the United States, the lawyers said.

The Nisoor Square incident took place on a Tuesday afternoon. A Blackwater team arrived in several vehicles at the intersection -- accounts differ as to why they were there -- and tried to stop traffic. Shooting erupted, leaving numerous Iraqis dead and wounded. Blackwater officials have said the guards came under fire; investigations by the U.S. military and the Iraqi government -- and initial findings by the FBI -- concluded that no one fired except the contractors.

WaPo Link

Will Mukasey really prosecute these guys?
I thought his job assignment was to keep a low profile until Bush leaves office.

If prosecuted, how likely are convictions?
I think convictions will be difficult but using the MEJA as a defense is very "weak sauce".

 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
In terms of Mukasey, I have zero faith, what a disaster of a man, anything may have been better than Gonzales, I did not expect the moon and the stars, but Mukasey has proved to be a totally worthless.
 

KGB

Diamond Member
May 11, 2000
3,042
0
0
Originally posted by: Lemon law
In terms of Mukasey, I have zero faith, what a disaster of a man, anything may have been better than Gonzales, I did not expect the moon and the stars, but Mukasey has proved to be a totally worthless.

I never thought I'd EVER pine for the days of Ashcroft.

As the article says, this is coming about as a condition of the negotiations with Malaki over the new security agreement. I don't expect Mukasey to persue this any further than absolutely necessary to keep the negotiations moving.
Perhaps when the next AG takes office he/she will "grow a pair".





 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
I have to agree with KGBMAN, anything now being talked about will have to wait until the next President and the next AG is selected. And then it will be another dilemma, because of limited resources.

While justice may demand we go back and prosecute those miscreants who escaped their proper prosecution during the GWB years, there will also be new and more present concerns as criminal activities never take a vacation.

But KGBMAN has struck another nerve, who would of a thunk it, that a nut like Ashcroft who would clothe stone statues, would resist the politicization of the people's justice department. While I would like to think that what Ashcroft stood for on principle is not than unusual a trait, but what Ashcroft did in a hospital , flat on his back and in pain, and then to be able to still stand on principle is still a remarkable act of courage and integrity.
 

Skitzer

Diamond Member
Mar 20, 2000
4,414
3
81
This is a joke ..... it will never gain any traction. The wrong party is in office.
 

KGB

Diamond Member
May 11, 2000
3,042
0
0
Originally posted by: Skitzer
This is a joke ..... it will never gain any traction. The wrong party is in office.


Not for much longer it seems.

BTW, who's laughing at this "joke"? The Iraqis? Blackwater?

 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
If they can prove that the guards did something wrong, then hang 'em. If not, then set them free.

The real question here is whether or not politics will interfere with true justice. It should be interesting...
 

colonel

Golden Member
Apr 22, 2001
1,785
21
81
hang'em high, these assholes are putting our troops in danger. They want Utah because the judge is more conservative.
 

KGB

Diamond Member
May 11, 2000
3,042
0
0
It looks as if one of them has already pled guilty

Story

By GINGER THOMPSON
Published: December 8, 2008
WASHINGTON ? In the first public airing of a case that remains the source of fierce international outrage, the Justice Department unsealed indictments here against five Blackwater security guards, accusing them of manslaughter and misuse of their firearms for the 2007 shooting in Baghdad?s Nisour Square that killed 17 Iraqi civilians and injured as many more.

Officials refused to say whether Mr. Ridgeway?s guilty plea indicated that he would testify against the other five.

Meanwhile the five, all decorated military veterans who had served the United States in trouble spots around the world and who were employed by Blackwater Worldwide, the largest security contractor in Iraq , surrendered together at a federal courthouse in Salt Lake City, Utah, where their lawyers accused the government of overstepping their authority and of tarnishing their clients? records of honorable service.

Mark Hulkower, a lawyer for one of the defendants, said the men surrendered in Utah, a relatively conservative, pro-military area, because they hoped to find a jury pool where ?people are more sympathetic to the experiences of coming under enemy fire.?

The court documents released Monday, however, said that Mr. Ridgeway had acted on purpose and without any justification when he fired his assault rifle into two vehicles.

?While there were dangers in Baghdad in September 2007, there were also ordinary people going about their lives performing mundane, daily tasks, like making their way through a crowded traffic circle,? Assistant Attorney General Patrick Rowan said at a news briefing.

Because the accused disregarded their obligations to protect such people, ?the consequences were devastating.? Mr. Rowan said. ?The government alleges today that at least 34 unarmed Iraqi civilians, including women and children, were killed or injured without justification or provocation by these security guards in the shooting at Nisour Square.?

Jeffrey Taylor, the United States lawyer for the District of Columbia, said the victims were ordinary Iraqi civilians going about their lives. ?The first victim was later identified as a second-year medical student named Ahmed Haithem Ahmed Al Rubia?y, who was driving a white Kia sedan that was approaching the traffic circle from the south,? Mr. Taylor said. ?The passenger of that vehicle was also shot and killed. That victim was Dr. Al Khazali, the mother of the driver of the vehicle.?

?None of the victims of this shooting was armed,? Mr. Taylor went on. ?None of them was an insurgent. Many were shot while inside civilian vehicles that were attempting to flee from the convoy. One victim was shot in the chest while standing in the street with his hands up. Another was injured from an grenade fired into a nearby girls? school.?

Legal experts suggested that the defendants would attempt to fend off the prosecution on technical grounds before an examination before a jury of the events at the center of the case.

Conviction could lead to long jail sentences, even decades of imprisonment.

Laws covering the actions of private contractors remain both unclear and untested, legal experts said.

This case has also been emblematic of the strained relations between the United States and the government of Iraq, which has insisted on holding security contractors responsible under Iraqi law for any future transgressions. The issue was central to adoption of the new security pact that is to govern forces in Iraq in the future.

Prosecutors said charges against the contractors were filed under the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act, which has been used to prosecute military personnel for crimes committed abroad.

In 2004, the law was amended to cover personnel whose work provides support to military personnel overseas. Prosecutors said that they will argue that the amendment covers security contractors working for the State Department in Iraq. The government will apparently argue in court that since Iraq is a war zone, that Blackwater?s diplomatic security work might have been handled by the U.S. military if it had not been outsourced to contractors.

The indictments are the culmination of a series of multi-pronged investigations that were started Sept. 16, 2007, when a Blackwater convoy opened fire on a busy Baghdad traffic circle. The guards told investigators they believed they were under attack. Investigators found no evidence to support the guards? accounts.

Joseph Persichini Jr. the assistant director in charge of the F.B.I.?s Washington field office, said that the Blackwater shooting case was one of the most difficult investigations ever conducted by the F.B.I. A team of 10 F.B.I. special agents deployed to Iraq for four weeks, with four follow-up trips to the country. More than 250 interviews of witnesses were conducted, and 200 pieces of physical evidence have been gathered for the trial, he said.

Mr. Taylor told reporters during a news conference at the Justice Department on Monday that the government believes it has answers to the questions of jurisdiction and venue that are expected to be raised by the defense. He also said that the government "takes no pleasure" in prosecuting those who help defend their fellow Americans overseas, but that the shootings in Nisour Square represented a blatant disregard for human life of non-Americans.

"We honor the brave service of the many U.S. contractors who are employed to support the mission of our armed forces in extremely difficult circumstances," Mr. Taylor said. "Today, we honor that service by holding accountable the very few individuals who abused that employment by committing some very serious crimes against dozens of innocent civilians."


Now I understand why they surrendered in Utah.