Just saying hi

Zensal

Senior member
Jan 18, 2005
740
0
0
I'm new around here and i figure i might as well use my comp to do some good while i'm not using it. Downloaded F@H, put the team number in(198 right?), and just got 2 questions: Does the command line run faster than the Graphical, and and is there anything else i should know?
 

Malak

Lifer
Dec 4, 2004
14,696
2
0
I don't believe the cli runs faster than the GUI, as long as you don't have the GUI status screen up all the time. That's the only real difference I see is that you have a graphical status screen instead of simply text.

We are also pushing for people to go for the bigger work units if they can, but that is dependant on how good your computer is. I'm only going to have 3 clients running with big work units, but one machine isn't that great so it won't run the big units. What are the stats of your rig?

Oh, and before I forget. Welcome to the TeAm.
 

Polo

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
4,185
0
0
Does the command line run faster than the Graphical : yes
is there anything else i should know? : If you have enough memory then choose to crunch big WUs : you will get more points.

Welcome to TA ! :D
 

Zensal

Senior member
Jan 18, 2005
740
0
0
Running it on my P4 3.06 with 768 MB of ram. How do you get bigger WUs?
 

BlackMountainCow

Diamond Member
May 28, 2003
5,759
0
0
Welcome Zensal to the TeAM and especially to the F@H project!

:beer::D:beer:

You should get the bigger WUs by setting on option somewhere in the setup/options/config menue of your client. I'm only using the CLI so I don't really know where to find it but I know it'S there, as some TA folks were talking aout that not too long ago.

Is that a Hyper Threaded Pentium 4? If so, are you running two instances? If you run two at the same time, your score will be higher by about 30% (?) or so, depending on the WU you're crunching.

A good stats page where you will pop up after you completed your first WU (some hours after sending it) is http://folding.extremeovercloc...user_list.php?s=&t=198


If you have any further questions: ask!! :)
 

ProviaFan

Lifer
Mar 17, 2001
14,993
1
0
The GUI is 1 or 2% slower than the CLI due to overhead of the graphical interface. For starting out, the GUI is fine; on the other hand, I'd recommend the CLI if you have a Windows NT, 2000, or XP system which is used in a multi-user fashion (so it's sitting at the login screen for a sizeable amount of time). Then you can run the CLI as a "service" which means that it will run regardless of whether someone's logged in or not, and it will be invisible (harder for the kids - or parents, or other relation, depending on your situation - to shut down). Installing the CLI as a service requires administrator privileges, and also since it is invisible, we generally recommend a program called F@H LogStats (linked in the other thread, IIRC) so you can keep an eye on that client, as well as any others you have on the same LAN. I'm quite willing to provide more details if you'd like to know. :)
 

Zensal

Senior member
Jan 18, 2005
740
0
0
I'm running S@H also, so i dont need 2 F@H's. But can someone post a link to instructions on how to make them background processes?
 

Coolkid

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2003
2,189
0
0
Originally posted by: Zensal
And I'm still confused about how to run the Seti Queue.
If you are just running the one machine, its probably easier if you use one of the TeAm SetiQueues, or just use something like SETIDriver :)
 

GLeeM

Elite Member
Apr 2, 2004
7,199
128
106
Running F@H and Seti on a HT Intel CPU works pretty good!

I think they use different resources of the CPU, so you get better times than if you ran two of the same client.

And welcome to the TeAm :)