• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

just read this...any thoughts?

Semidevil

Diamond Member


Which one will you choose?

A group of children were playing near two railway tracks, one still in use while the other disused. Only one child played on the disused track, the rest on the operational track.

The train comes, and you were just beside the track interchange. You could make the train change its course to the disused track and save most of the kids.

However, that would also mean that the lone child playing by the disused track would be sacrificed. Or would you rather let the train go its way?

Let's take a pause to think what kind of decision we could make.............

How do you decide?

What is your decision?

Most people might choose to divert the course of the train,and sacrifice only one child. You might think the same way, I guess.

Exactly, I thought the same way initially because to save most of the children at the expense of only one child was rational decision most people would make, morally and emotionally.

But, have you ever thought that the child choosing to play on the disused track had in fact made the right decision to play at a safe place?

Nevertheless, he had to be sacrificed because of his ignorant friends who chose to play where the danger was.

This kind of dilemma happens around us everyday. In the office, community, in politics and especially in a democratic society, the minority is often sacrificed for the interest of the majority, no matter how foolish or ignorant the majority are, and how farsighted and knowledgeable the minority are.

The child who chose not to play with the rest on the operational track was sidelined. And in the case he was sacrificed, no one would shed a tear
for him.

The friend who forwarded me the story said he would not try to change the course of the train because he believed that the kids playing on the operational track should have known very well that track was still in use and that they should have run away if they heard the train's sirens.

If the train was diverted, that lone child would definitely die because he never thought the train could come over to that track!

Moreover, that track was not in use probably because it was not safe. If the train was diverted to the track, we could put the lives of all passengers on board at stake! And in your attempt to save a few kids by sacrificing one child, you might end up sacrificing hundreds of people to save these few kids.

While we are all aware that life is full of tough decisions that need to be made, we may not realize that hasty decisions may not always be the right one. "Remember that what's right isn't always popular... and what's popular isn't always right."

Everybody makes mistakes; that's why they put erasers on pencils.

 
It's the parents fault the kids are playing on train tracks in the first place.

Arrest them when their kids are dead.
 
I'd let the group of kids die--they were being stupid, they suffer the consequences.

Granted I hadn't considered the people on the train. I guess that's something you don't think in the immediate situation. Good post!
 
The example uses undifferntiated "children".

A child doesn't have the capacity to realize the consequences of their actions, so doesn't serve as an example for adult society.
 
Survival of the most adapt, Darwin Theory, yada yada yada. I would not attempt to switch the train. But if I had the chance to save ALL of them well sure.
 
Originally posted by: djheater
The example uses undifferntiated "children".

A child doesn't have the capacity to realize the consequences of their actions, so doesn't serve as an example for adult society.

adults don't usually play by tracks though 😛
 
Originally posted by: djheater
The example uses undifferntiated "children".

A child doesn't have the capacity to realize the consequences of their actions, so doesn't serve as an example for adult society.

😕
 
what if the track was unused for a reason, and by diverting the train onto that track, you'd be potentially killing people on the train as well, if the train derailed / fell into a pit / whatever.

I'd just shout out a warning to the kids on the track; even if they didn't hear the warning, it's expected that among a group of children, at least one will notice the loud uncomming train and get the rest to safety.
 
Well, speaking as a lawyer, you should do nothing.

You could be criminally liable for killing a child - or children - if you flip the switch. There is not a legally recognized duty to rescue. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: mobobuff
Originally posted by: djheater
The example uses undifferntiated "children".

A child doesn't have the capacity to realize the consequences of their actions, so doesn't serve as an example for adult society.

😕

Originally posted by: Semidevil

But, have you ever thought that the child choosing to play on the disused track had in fact made the right decision to play at a safe place?

Nevertheless, he had to be sacrificed because of his ignorant friends who chose to play where the danger was.

I don't dispute that it might be parable, what I dispute is that you can't possibly hold the children responsible for their actions in this scenario, so you can't use that as a basis for your decision.

As adults we are responsible for children, all of them. we don't get to not be responsible for the ones that are misbehaving.
 
Is this a bullet train or what? Normally you can hear trains almost a mile away, so surely they could escape. Assuming they can't though, I'd let the group of kids die for being careless.
 
Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy
Is this a bullet train or what? Normally you can hear trains almost a mile away, so surely they could escape. Assuming they can't though, I'd let the group of kids die for being careless.

Deaf school.
 
Back
Top