Just got banned from the Democratic Underground

Mrburns2007

Platinum Member
Jun 14, 2001
2,595
0
0
Guess I didn't post enough "Bush is the Devil" posts.

What a bunch of lamers....

If you think overall that George W. Bush is doing a swell job, or if you wish to see Republicans win, or if you are generally supportive of conservative ideals, please do not register to post, as you will likely be banned.
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
You expected something different? I'm sure if i go to a Christian site and start spewing anti-Christian rhetoric, i'll be ban too.
 

Mrburns2007

Platinum Member
Jun 14, 2001
2,595
0
0
Thought the site was about Democracy and there would be some debate but it is mostly calling Bush names.

 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
Originally posted by: Mrburns2007
Thought the site was about Democracy and there would be some debate but it is mostly calling Bush names.

Democratic Underground... even by the name it sounds like they're extreme democratics.
 

Skyclad1uhm1

Lifer
Aug 10, 2001
11,383
87
91
Originally posted by: Mrburns2007
Thought the site was about Democracy and there would be some debate but it is mostly calling Bush names.

So again, what did you post?

Wanting to start a debate and actually doing it is something different. If I'd go to a Republican site and post that I would have liked it if Osama had succeeded in flying a plane into the White House and killing Bush I'd also not be surprised to get banned. If I'd say I wasn't pro-Bush but would like to see their point of view on some of the matters and discuss it with them, I'd be more surprised if I got rocked.
 

Mrburns2007

Platinum Member
Jun 14, 2001
2,595
0
0
Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Originally posted by: Mrburns2007
Thought the site was about Democracy and there would be some debate but it is mostly calling Bush names.

So again, what did you post?

Wanting to start a debate and actually doing it is something different. If I'd go to a Republican site and post that I would have liked it if Osama had succeeded in flying a plane into the White House and killing Bush I'd also not be surprised to get banned. If I'd say I wasn't pro-Bush but would like to see their point of view on some of the matters and discuss it with them, I'd be more surprised if I got rocked.

Not sure why I was banned but I think it was a reply to a where they were discussing the looting of that museum and that it was all Bush's fault. I thought it was the responsiblity of the people that actual broke stuff. There were plenty of replies to my reply.

 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
56,781
17,382
146
Originally posted by: Mrburns2007
Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Originally posted by: Mrburns2007
Thought the site was about Democracy and there would be some debate but it is mostly calling Bush names.

So again, what did you post?

Wanting to start a debate and actually doing it is something different. If I'd go to a Republican site and post that I would have liked it if Osama had succeeded in flying a plane into the White House and killing Bush I'd also not be surprised to get banned. If I'd say I wasn't pro-Bush but would like to see their point of view on some of the matters and discuss it with them, I'd be more surprised if I got rocked.

Not sure why I was banned but I think it was a reply to a where they were discussing the looting of that museum and that it was all Bush's fault. I thought it was the responsiblity of the people that actual broke stuff. There were plenty of replies to my reply.

Link us to some of your stuff.
 

Barnaby W. Füi

Elite Member
Aug 14, 2001
12,343
0
0
Rabid democrats are idiots. At least rabid republicans can hold up a *decent* argument, it's pretty funny seeing war protesters and whatnot, all they can come up with is "bush is evil" and how it's just about oil and blah blah blah. Don't get me wrong, I'm very liberal (socially), I just think that democrats are stupid. The whole republican/democrat two party thing is stupid. I don't remember the exact quote, but I heard an awesome quote once to the effect of the two parties basically being there to occupy stupid people with bickering while the smart people get things done behind the scenes.
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
Typical liberal viewpoint. Individuals cannot be expected to be responsible for their own actions.

Out of curiosity, if the city of New York decided that they didn't want to pay the law enforcement any longer... and they went on strike, so that there were no law enforcement within New York, and looting started to happen, where would the fault go to?

 

Mrburns2007

Platinum Member
Jun 14, 2001
2,595
0
0
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Typical liberal viewpoint. Individuals cannot be expected to be responsible for their own actions.

Out of curiosity, if the city of New York decided that they didn't want to pay the law enforcement any longer... and they went on strike, so that there were no law enforcement within New York, and looting started to happen, where would the fault go to?

It'd be the Bush Criminal Clans fault.
rolleye.gif

 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
Originally posted by: Mrburns2007
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Typical liberal viewpoint. Individuals cannot be expected to be responsible for their own actions.

Out of curiosity, if the city of New York decided that they didn't want to pay the law enforcement any longer... and they went on strike, so that there were no law enforcement within New York, and looting started to happen, where would the fault go to?

It'd be the Bush Criminal Clans fault.
rolleye.gif

Ah, so you can't come up with a logical response, so you're trying to be sarcastic?

Thomas Hobbes said it best when he said the nature of man is a nature of war (State of Nature). When there are no laws or higher power to control us, we live like beasts in the wild, where every man is in competition with every other man. So is it not logical to assume, if we disrupt that nature and remove law, that some looting is going to occur?
 

KK

Lifer
Jan 2, 2001
15,903
4
81
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Typical liberal viewpoint. Individuals cannot be expected to be responsible for their own actions.

Out of curiosity, if the city of New York decided that they didn't want to pay the law enforcement any longer... and they went on strike, so that there were no law enforcement within New York, and looting started to happen, where would the fault go to?

If looting started happening and I owned a shop in new york, you better damn well know I'd be protecting it lethally.

KK
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
Originally posted by: KK
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Typical liberal viewpoint. Individuals cannot be expected to be responsible for their own actions.

Out of curiosity, if the city of New York decided that they didn't want to pay the law enforcement any longer... and they went on strike, so that there were no law enforcement within New York, and looting started to happen, where would the fault go to?

If looting started happening and I owned a shop in new york, you better damn well know I'd be protecting it lethally.

KK

I didn't ask if you would protect it.
 

KK

Lifer
Jan 2, 2001
15,903
4
81
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: KK
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Typical liberal viewpoint. Individuals cannot be expected to be responsible for their own actions.

Out of curiosity, if the city of New York decided that they didn't want to pay the law enforcement any longer... and they went on strike, so that there were no law enforcement within New York, and looting started to happen, where would the fault go to?

If looting started happening and I owned a shop in new york, you better damn well know I'd be protecting it lethally.

KK

I didn't ask if you would protect it.

Ok, well I ain't going to shoot the police officers that aren't there to protect me. Let';s see I'm going to shoot the one's responsible, the looters.

KK