- Dec 27, 2001
- 11,272
- 1
- 0
Does it make a difference if I get a 133X card as opposed to a 45X? I imagine the camera itself has it's own buffer and there's no movie mode.
Originally posted by: morkus64
i think 24mb... you can take 4 RAW shots in a row as it is... A faster card would enable you to take a few more... according to imaging-resource.com the D50 can shoot 2.5 frames per second, and a RAW file averages 7.5mb (Nikon uses lossless compression and a proprietary format for RAW files (NEF)), so theoretically, if you had a card whicbh wrote at 18.75 mb/sec, you could shoot continuously. Of course that's just theoretical, and I haven't tried it. The kingston ultimate cards write at 20mb/sec, but are fairly expensive, and the corsair 133x write at 15.5mb/sec, and are reasonable priced.
If you are shooting JPEG, large/fine images are 3.6mb, so a faster card is not as necessary.
Again... theoretical! I don't know exactly how everything works, so the camera's buffer speed itself may limit things. maybe someone can provide more insight?
