I just beat Call of Duty: World at War today, and I was just happy it was over. While the game itself was really well done, it really wasn't as polished as Call of Duty 4. I really liked both games, but I got sucked into COD4, and I never really felt that "pull" for this game, you know? The story was really disjointed, a lot of missions just kind of....ended, and some of the voice acting (Russian in particular) was just too over the top.
Granted, I may be a little jaded, and maybe just sick of games based on WW2- having played MOHAA, Breakthrough, Spearhead, Rising Sun, Frontlines, COD 1,2, United Offensive, and beating Company of Heroes twice. I really loved the modern day stuff in COD4, so I guess this World at War game already had a couple strikes against it...
I'd probably give this game a 7/10. Graphics were great, the missions were pretty varied (except for torching every Japanese soldier I came across - that got a little boring...wait, that was awesome), maybe it's just time for me to stop playing WW2 shooters.
Granted, I may be a little jaded, and maybe just sick of games based on WW2- having played MOHAA, Breakthrough, Spearhead, Rising Sun, Frontlines, COD 1,2, United Offensive, and beating Company of Heroes twice. I really loved the modern day stuff in COD4, so I guess this World at War game already had a couple strikes against it...
I'd probably give this game a 7/10. Graphics were great, the missions were pretty varied (except for torching every Japanese soldier I came across - that got a little boring...wait, that was awesome), maybe it's just time for me to stop playing WW2 shooters.