poofyhairguy
Lifer
- Nov 20, 2005
- 14,612
- 318
- 126
At home, the PQ on the 4K is noticeably better on both bluray playback on a PS3 and DirectTV than on my 70" 1080p Aquos (and the PQ on the aqous ain't too shabby)...
Which might be the case. I mean, the 4k TV is a newer TV. No matter the resolution it should look better, especially because Aquos has been an overrated brand for a decade. The problem is that we can't compared the exact same 4k TV to the exact same 1080p TV because each panel is always different.
With that said, there are hard and fast rules that pretty much always apply. One of them is that 1080p content will in general look better played at its native resolution, and the other is that NO current 4K tv even comes close to the picture quality we get from the top 1080p TVs like the OLEDs or old Kuros.
For those that say that 4K can't make 1080p better, have you seen the 4K displays in a store? why do the 4K Sonys and Samsungs look better than the 1080p sets?
Two reasons:
1. Most of the time they are playing 4k content. 4k content looks better than 1080p content in almost all cases. The problem is a lack of the 4k content.
2. It simply is a better panel. Resolution is one part of what defines a TV. Honestly picture quality is MUCH more determined by black levels and color accuracy than resolution IMHO.
Can upscaled 1080p look good? Yes, yes it can. But you aren't seeing that in a store. Only time I have seen a 1080p source on a 4K TV that didn't make me miss my Panasonics is when a friend showed me something playing on his superHTPC with MadVR configured to a T. But we are talking about a gaming level GPU to get there- no regular consumer equipment can do that outside of some expensive Oppo.
Last edited:
