I'd like a link to that
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...-accusers-felt-trapped-prosecutors-claim.html
One of many from a basic google/Bing search.
I'd like a link to that
guess I'm the idiot then, it's not like the majority of rape victim act irrationally afterwards or anything.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...-accusers-felt-trapped-prosecutors-claim.html
One of many from a basic google/Bing search.
But Clare Montgomery QC, representing the Swedish Prosecution Authority, told the court that the womens accounts that they had let Mr Assange continue during the encounters did not mean they had freely consented.
well there you have it.
What is happening to Assange is commonly referred to as Character Assassination. It only works because idiots fall for it.
What is happening to Assange is commonly referred to as Character Assassination. It only works because idiots fall for it.
what is happening to Assange is commonly reffered to as Legel proceedings, luckily it works inspite of idiots.
So your idea of rape is the woman says ok but then after says well I was not 100% and did not say no.
RAPE!!!!
Are you really this dumb or just trolling?
To be fair, Assange is indeed a piece of shit. not a hard target for character assassination.
None of his former or current employees seem to like him. He's a class A shitface, from the personal accounts that I have read and heard.
Still, he didn't rape that girl. The charges are a joke.
"inspite" is not a word
![]()
so if I rob your ass and you don't try and stop me, I can't be prosecuted for robbery? good to know.
If I let you in my house and you ask to take my TV and I say ok. I can't the next day call the police and say you stole it from me and ask that you be charged.
Just as I can't have sex with someone and give permission then the next day say it was rape.
er no
inviting someone over to watch TV and they steal it while you're in the bathroom is a more accurate analogy.
No its not.
She let him in - Correct
She did not say no or tell him to stop - Correct
She made him breakfast and even bragged on twitter about having him - Correct.
Tell me where the rape happened in that?
She even told a friend of hers that she only went to the police to make him take a HIV test, no more. They are taking ti farther then she wants.
and now we're back to the irrational behavior discussion...
also I feel like you kinda left a few things out, might just be me though:whiste:
AGAIN you keep saying rape when all the facts say other wise.
Please show me where she said no and said it was rape.
She does not have to say no for it to be rape
she made it clear to him that he would have to wear a condom, and he did not get consent, therefore rape.
She does not have to say no for it to be rape
she made it clear to him that he would have to wear a condom, and he did not get consent, therefore rape.
so if I rob your ass and you don't try and stop me, I can't be prosecuted for robbery? good to know.
Err why? (anyone that's ever had sex with a virgin is asking the same question...)
I don't ask my girlfriend for consent when we have sex. The process just begins. Am I raping her?
AGAIN her words...
"She later said that, despite her concerns about unprotected sex, she “let him continue” because she “felt it was too late”, Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Ouseley heard."
AND...
"He also read the court extracts from the statement of a friend of the second woman who claimed that she had been “railroaded” by police into making a rape allegation.
She had gone to the authorities only because she wanted to force him to be tested for sexually transmitted diseases but matters had “not gone the way she wanted”, according to the friend’s statement. "
Even SHE says it was not rape.
That's a horrible analogy. Try to use at least another 5% of your brain next time.
the line gets more blurry in committed relationships, but husbands have been convicted for raping their wives.
can you answer me why Assange is so deadset on not going to trial?
