The answer is this of course.
The reason is that the study that Eskimo touted for years about media bias admitted that it existed and is measurable. So thanks Eskimo for finally being honest and admitting to what everyone already knows, that media bias exists and that JournoList was another example of it.
This is of course a massive distortion that you keep attempting to pawn off, because you're simply a liar. The exact quote from the study was this:
On the whole, no significant biases were found for the newspaper industry. Biases in newsmagazines were virtually zero as well. However, meta-analysis of studies of television network news showed small, measurable, but probably insubstantial coverage and statement biases.
As I've said before, if you wish to adopt that stance as your view on media bias I'm happy to hear that you've learned to accept evidence. More likely though, you're just interested in childishly fighting people.