Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Infohawk
CkG, I am proud of you for finally using reason in one of your posts. (I apologize to everyone for being off-topic but it's a step forward for CkG in my opinion).
Buahahahahaha. That's awful kind of you there info but you're premise is flawed. Just because you finally saw how my posts are reasoned and logical doesn't mean
I did something. Maybe you just had a moment of clarity. But yes, it was reasoned and logical - that's how I post. You could probably learn a thing or two if you paid attention
CkG
Most of your posts are along the lines of "Buahahahahaha. bleat. quip. quip. namecall. " (in no particular order). For once, with conjur, you didn't do that and stuck to the arguments. For that, I congrajulate you! Alas you have already fallen back into your old patterns.
I haven't seen any solid displays of reason in your other posts. Here, Conjur was suggesting something in his statement . What he was suggesting was flawed (that that list of names suggests there aren't more liberal journalists). In conjur's defense, he never expressly stated that but it could be fair to impune that view on his comment. (it's possible that's not what he meant).
But for this sentence, there would have been a high probability your next post would have been something as follows: "Nice try infopigeon. Bwahahahahhahah. Your premise is flawed. We've already been over this." For a moment there, with conjur, your arguments were clear. I will try not to forget that you are capable of being reasonable.