- Feb 16, 2005
- 14,080
- 5,453
- 136
Sorry hard to post a link for this, but this is breaking news. AND THE BEST NEWS SO FAR TODAY (after dumbsfeld).
www.cnn.com!
YAY!
www.cnn.com!
YAY!
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Sorry hard to post a link for this, but this is breaking news. AND THE BEST NEWS SO FAR TODAY (after dumbsfeld).
www.cnn.com!
YAY!
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Sorry hard to post a link for this, but this is breaking news. AND THE BEST NEWS SO FAR TODAY (after dumbsfeld).
www.cnn.com!
YAY!
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Sorry hard to post a link for this, but this is breaking news. AND THE BEST NEWS SO FAR TODAY (after dumbsfeld).
www.cnn.com!
YAY!
This is horrible news imho. The last thing I want is for the Democrats to control everything (once they win the Presidency). I guess that is the independent in me that prefers BALANCE over complete domination.
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Sorry hard to post a link for this, but this is breaking news. AND THE BEST NEWS SO FAR TODAY (after dumbsfeld).
www.cnn.com!
YAY!
This is horrible news imho. The last thing I want is for the Democrats to control everything (once they win the Presidency). I guess that is the independent in me that prefers BALANCE over complete domination.
The heat is on the dems if they take both houses. If they do nothing with it they may find themselves on the wrong end of the election come 08.
I thikn them capturing both houses is the best thing imo. I have been hoping it would happen for months. These republicans needed to be put in their place.
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Sorry hard to post a link for this, but this is breaking news. AND THE BEST NEWS SO FAR TODAY (after dumbsfeld).
www.cnn.com!
YAY!
This is horrible news imho. The last thing I want is for the Democrats to control everything (once they win the Presidency). I guess that is the independent in me that prefers BALANCE over complete domination.
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Sorry hard to post a link for this, but this is breaking news. AND THE BEST NEWS SO FAR TODAY (after dumbsfeld).
www.cnn.com!
YAY!
This is horrible news imho. The last thing I want is for the Democrats to control everything (once they win the Presidency). I guess that is the independent in me that prefers BALANCE over complete domination.
The heat is on the dems if they take both houses. If they do nothing with it they may find themselves on the wrong end of the election come 08.
I thikn them capturing both houses is the best thing imo. I have been hoping it would happen for months. These republicans needed to be put in their place.
/totally agree
having the Dems in control of both houses does two things: gives the Democratic party a platform to run on ("here's what we accomplished in 2 years and why you should re-elect us"), and gives the Republican party a platform to run against.
here's hoping the 2008 election is about real issues. :thumbsup:
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Sorry hard to post a link for this, but this is breaking news. AND THE BEST NEWS SO FAR TODAY (after dumbsfeld).
www.cnn.com!
YAY!
This is horrible news imho. The last thing I want is for the Democrats to control everything (once they win the Presidency). I guess that is the independent in me that prefers BALANCE over complete domination.
Originally posted by: Genx87
I think them capturing both houses is the best thing imo.
I have been hoping it would happen for months.
These republicans needed to be put in their place.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Genx87
I think them capturing both houses is the best thing imo.
I have been hoping it would happen for months.
These republicans needed to be put in their place.
You have been 110% Republican every single day.
What wool are you trying pull over who?
They talked about that last night on Fox.Originally posted by: loki8481
/totally agree
having the Dems in control of both houses does two things: gives the Democratic party a platform to run on ("here's what we accomplished in 2 years and why you should re-elect us"), and gives the Republican party a platform to run against.
here's hoping the 2008 election is about real issues. :thumbsup:
I'm amazed you even showed up, today after all of your predictions and choices were shot down in a momentary blaze of electoral sanity, yesterday. Why am I not suprised to find you trotting out your new range of lies and distractions you can spew for the next two years? :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:Originally posted by: DishonestJohn
They talked about that last night on Fox.
This election was about the past, mainly Iraq.
In 2008 with Bush gone the Democrats can't run on against the past and have to offer something other than we aren't Republicans.
Republicans will have to do the same. Should be a very different election.
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Sorry hard to post a link for this, but this is breaking news. AND THE BEST NEWS SO FAR TODAY (after dumbsfeld).
www.cnn.com!
YAY!
This is horrible news imho. The last thing I want is for the Democrats to control everything (once they win the Presidency). I guess that is the independent in me that prefers BALANCE over complete domination.
The heat is on the dems if they take both houses. If they do nothing with it they may find themselves on the wrong end of the election come 08.
I thikn them capturing both houses is the best thing imo. I have been hoping it would happen for months. These republicans needed to be put in their place.
/totally agree
having the Dems in control of both houses does two things: gives the Democratic party a platform to run on ("here's what we accomplished in 2 years and why you should re-elect us"), and gives the Republican party a platform to run against.
here's hoping the 2008 election is about real issues. :thumbsup:
Agreed. Great summary.
I'd love nothing more than the Neocons hammered down, the real Republicans surging, and the government reigned in.
If they did all of that, I'd come back to the Republicans no problem.
I'll give the Dems a medal if they return us to balance budgets. I just don't want to see the money sucked from the military/war on terror (okay, maybe slowly away from Iraq), and then spent on new social welfare for seniors and illegals.
Originally posted by: Harvey
I'm amazed you even showed up, today after all of your predictions and choices were shot down in a momentary blaze of electoral sanity, yesterday. Why am I not suprised to find you trotting out your new range of lies and distractions you can spew for the next two years? :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:Originally posted by: DishonestJohn
They talked about that last night on Fox.
This election was about the past, mainly Iraq.
In 2008 with Bush gone the Democrats can't run on against the past and have to offer something other than we aren't Republicans.
Republicans will have to do the same. Should be a very different election.
I wouldn't even care if a Repub gets elected in 2008 as long as the Dem's control Congress. Monumental win last night.Originally posted by: ProfJohn
They talked about that last night on Fox.Originally posted by: loki8481
/totally agree
having the Dems in control of both houses does two things: gives the Democratic party a platform to run on ("here's what we accomplished in 2 years and why you should re-elect us"), and gives the Republican party a platform to run against.
here's hoping the 2008 election is about real issues. :thumbsup:
This election was about the past, mainly Iraq.
In 2008 with Bush gone the Democrats can't run on against the past and have to offer something other than we aren't Republicans.
Republicans will have to do the same. Should be a very different election.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
I'll give the Dems a medal if they return us to balance budgets. I just don't want to see the money sucked from the military/war on terror (okay, maybe slowly away from Iraq), and then spent on new social welfare for seniors and illegals.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
They talked about that last night on Fox.Originally posted by: loki8481
/totally agree
having the Dems in control of both houses does two things: gives the Democratic party a platform to run on ("here's what we accomplished in 2 years and why you should re-elect us"), and gives the Republican party a platform to run against.
here's hoping the 2008 election is about real issues. :thumbsup:
This election was about the past, mainly Iraq.
In 2008 with Bush gone the Democrats can't run on against the past and have to offer something other than we aren't Republicans.
Republicans will have to do the same. Should be a very different election.
NO! It is NOT! :thumbsdown: :frown: :thumbsdown:Originally posted by: CellarDoor
Originally posted by: Harvey
I'm amazed you even showed up, today after all of your predictions and choices were shot down in a momentary blaze of electoral sanity, yesterday. Why am I not suprised to find you trotting out your new range of lies and distractions you can spew for the next two years? :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:Originally posted by: DishonestJohn
They talked about that last night on Fox.
This election was about the past, mainly Iraq.
In 2008 with Bush gone the Democrats can't run on against the past and have to offer something other than we aren't Republicans.
Republicans will have to do the same. Should be a very different election.
Come on Harvey. What he said is pretty true for the most part.
Originally posted by: Harvey
NO! It is NOT! :thumbsdown: :frown: :thumbsdown:Originally posted by: CellarDoor
Originally posted by: Harvey
I'm amazed you even showed up, today after all of your predictions and choices were shot down in a momentary blaze of electoral sanity, yesterday. Why am I not suprised to find you trotting out your new range of lies and distractions you can spew for the next two years? :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:Originally posted by: DishonestJohn
They talked about that last night on Fox.
This election was about the past, mainly Iraq.
In 2008 with Bush gone the Democrats can't run on against the past and have to offer something other than we aren't Republicans.
Republicans will have to do the same. Should be a very different election.
Come on Harvey. What he said is pretty true for the most part.
