Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Originally posted by: DonVito
I find it fascinating that the uninformed are so quick to call McCain a liberal. I guess it's an artifact of the smear jobs the Bush campaign laid on him in 2000, as well as the fact that he has (at least on some issues) demonstrated the ability for independent thought, something neither party seems especially fond of.
That, and the animosity some still hold for him, over nearly supplanting their man for the nomination.
That raises an interesting issue: where would we be today if McCain had beaten Bush in 2000? We sure as hell wouldn't be in Iraq . . .
Even at that, he's damaged merchandise. He's spending too much time courting the Religious Right
hoping to get them behind him - while he should be looking to make amends with the Middle of America Moderates.
The looney fringes of the 25% Right or the 25% Liberal partisans won't help either candidate except as core/base.
Their minds are made up - you could hear it slamming like a door . . closed, nothing left to consider.
The 'Old Fashion High Button Shoe' terminology was 'The Silent Majority' - those 50% of the voting population
is what sways every election, and when they don't participate the radicals attempt to steamroll the opponents.
This cycle if the Right radicals don't play due to the lack of monolithic 'Value Issues' there might be a chance
of normalacy returning to the country and a return to bipartisan negotiations for everyone.
Better chance of that happening if the Democrats do win big in contrast to the continuation of
'My Way or the Highway' philosophy that the GOP has taken with their huge 1% victory in the last couple elections.