Joe Biden says it perfectly

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,212
9,007
136
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: alchemize
Now I ask you again for the 3rd (and last) time. how will the Dems "finish the job"?
*cricket* *cricket*
The sad answer remains the same. The Bushwhackos have left us no good options, just a lot of ugly ones, but the fact remains that they haven't YET been sent off to their well deserved retreat to the Guantanamo Hilton so that remains the first priority.

Regardless of what comes after that, the only fact that's patently clear is, we can't trust the same criminal assholes who got us here to lead us out of the mess they created. :|

That about sums it up. In the real world, people that fvck up like this are fired, and someone else is brought in to replace them. Then again this isn't the real world, its faith based government.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
We're talking afghanistan here, not Iraq. The republicans didn't "screw america" by invading afghanistan. There is very little disagreement on if we should be in Afghanistan. The Republicans didn't push invading afghanistan "onto you" by a longshot.

What the dems are whining about are the tactics that were used. If they don't have better tactics and aren't willing to introduce them as legislation, then they should STFU.
 

chowderhead

Platinum Member
Dec 7, 1999
2,633
263
126
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: outriding
Originally posted by: alchemize

I ask again, how will the Dems "finish the job". And why can't they start that process now hmm?

Why is it up to the Dems to fix the problems?

Bush pushed this on America, so why are you not asking why isn't the Reps plan so solve this?
Different poster, same answer.

Dems can't introduce legislation? Dems think that minimum wage needs raising, they try to fix it and introduce legislation. Apparently Dems think that raising minimum wage is more important legislation to introduce than "finishing the job". At least if they introduced legislation and the repubs voted against it, then they would have proposed a plan.

Frankly, I think that if somebody complains about something, then they should have a solution. Otherwise they are just whining. This is just pre-election politics, nothing more.

Kerry/Feingold.... Reid/Levin... remember those?

Not a single bill gets through committee with Republican approval... not a single bill gets to the floor without Frist's approval. How hard is that for people to understand?
Oh - in that case why even bother showing up for work? Give me a break...if the Dems wanted a plan it to be voted on, it would be. A good plan would probably have lots of bi-partisan support.

Again, the answer is, the dems don't introduce a "finish the job" legislation, because they have no workable plan. Neither side does. The dems are perfectly happy with the status quo. This is a competely moot point, it's nothing but pre-election whining about the past.

The issue is that the legislature is a terrible place to implement a war/battle strategy. How do you legislate ground troops or battlefield strategies? Yes, Congress has completely failed in its oversight role. But, ultimately, the onus is on the President and the administration and his secretaries/military leaders to execute a plan. The people in 2004 voted to "stay the course" in Iraq and Afghanistan and Bush was reelected. Until you replace the people in charge, they are ultimately responsible.

 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,212
9,007
136
Originally posted by: alchemize
We're talking afghanistan here, not Iraq. The republicans didn't "screw america" by invading afghanistan. There is very little disagreement on if we should be in Afghanistan. The Republicans didn't push invading afghanistan "onto you" by a longshot.

What the dems are whining about are the tactics that were used. If they don't have better tactics and aren't willing to introduce them as legislation, then they should STFU.

Good work with the strawmen.

No one is saying they "screwed america" (nice quote that never appears here btw) by invading afghanistan. They did screw it up once there, and again by pulling SF troops out before the job was done in order to go on that sightseeing trip in Iraq. Or do you disagree with those points as well?
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: outriding
Originally posted by: alchemize

I ask again, how will the Dems "finish the job". And why can't they start that process now hmm?

Why is it up to the Dems to fix the problems?

Bush pushed this on America, so why are you not asking why isn't the Reps plan so solve this?
Different poster, same answer.

Dems can't introduce legislation? Dems think that minimum wage needs raising, they try to fix it and introduce legislation. Apparently Dems think that raising minimum wage is more important legislation to introduce than "finishing the job". At least if they introduced legislation and the repubs voted against it, then they would have proposed a plan.

Frankly, I think that if somebody complains about something, then they should have a solution. Otherwise they are just whining. This is just pre-election politics, nothing more.

Actually, there have been a couple of proposals offered. The Repubs voted almost unanamously (all but Chaffee) to defeat them. The Repubs did, however, put to vote a completely political POS bill calling for immediate withdrawal knowing that no one, D or R, could ever possibly vote for it. Sadly, three senators actually did.

Murtha's Proposal

Levin-Reed Proposal Iraq

Kerry proposal

The answers are there if you are truly looking. If there is a phased redeployment of troops out of Iraq (please don't read as a talking point "cut and run"...I'm talking a gradual withdrawl of troops at appropriate times) forcing the Iraqis off of the American military's teet, there would be enough troops, equipment and resources to go back into Afghanistan and squash the recent Taliban uprising in the southern part of the country.

You would then be able to getting two symbolic victories. One in Iraq where the government has shown that it has a stronghold amongst the population and is ready to take their democratic process into their own hands. The other would be allocating enough troops to smoke out OBL and bring him to justice.
All 3 of those are about Iraq. They say nothing about re-deploying troops to afghanistan. No dem has made any proposal about "finishing the job" in afghanistan that I'm aware of.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: alchemize
We're talking afghanistan here, not Iraq. The republicans didn't "screw america" by invading afghanistan. There is very little disagreement on if we should be in Afghanistan. The Republicans didn't push invading afghanistan "onto you" by a longshot.

What the dems are whining about are the tactics that were used. If they don't have better tactics and aren't willing to introduce them as legislation, then they should STFU.

Good work with the strawmen.

No one is saying they "screwed america" (nice quote that never appears here btw) by invading afghanistan. They did screw it up once there, and again by pulling SF troops out before the job was done in order to go on that sightseeing trip in Iraq. Or do you disagree with those points as well?
Actually, outriding said just that:

Originally posted by: outriding

Cliffs:

My beloved Republicans screwed America over but until the Dems come up with something that will get us out of this situation that the Reps put us in it the the Dems fault.

---

The Reps pushed this crap onto us. Why cannot they [Reps] come up with a good plan?

 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: alchemize
Now I ask you again for the 3rd (and last) time. how will the Dems "finish the job"?
*cricket* *cricket*
The sad answer remains the same. The Bushwhackos have left us no good options, just a lot of ugly ones, but the fact remains that they haven't YET been sent off to their well deserved retreat to the Guantanamo Hilton so that remains the first priority.

Regardless of what comes after that, the only fact that's patently clear is, we can't trust the same criminal assholes who got us here to lead us out of the mess they created. :|

That about sums it up. In the real world, people that fvck up like this are fired, and someone else is brought in to replace them. Then again this isn't the real world, its faith based government.

Apparently you don't work for a living. People screw up all the time in the real world. Eventually they get fired, but often times everyone has to pitch in to clean up the mess they created.

Or perhaps that's common to dems in the workplace - they go "ain't my fault he screwed up, I'm not helping clean up his mess till he gets fired". Hmm, maybe I'm seeing a trend here...
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,212
9,007
136
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: alchemize
Now I ask you again for the 3rd (and last) time. how will the Dems "finish the job"?
*cricket* *cricket*
The sad answer remains the same. The Bushwhackos have left us no good options, just a lot of ugly ones, but the fact remains that they haven't YET been sent off to their well deserved retreat to the Guantanamo Hilton so that remains the first priority.

Regardless of what comes after that, the only fact that's patently clear is, we can't trust the same criminal assholes who got us here to lead us out of the mess they created. :|

That about sums it up. In the real world, people that fvck up like this are fired, and someone else is brought in to replace them. Then again this isn't the real world, its faith based government.

Apparently you don't work for a living. People screw up all the time in the real world. Eventually they get fired, but often times everyone has to pitch in to clean up the mess they created.

Or perhaps that's common to dems in the workplace - they go "ain't my fault he screwed up, I'm not helping clean up his mess till he gets fired". Hmm, maybe I'm seeing a trend here...

I do work for a living. Thanks for the personal attacks though. Considering you don't have anything else to go on, it might be your best course of action.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: alchemize
Now I ask you again for the 3rd (and last) time. how will the Dems "finish the job"?
*cricket* *cricket*
The sad answer remains the same. The Bushwhackos have left us no good options, just a lot of ugly ones, but the fact remains that they haven't YET been sent off to their well deserved retreat to the Guantanamo Hilton so that remains the first priority.

Regardless of what comes after that, the only fact that's patently clear is, we can't trust the same criminal assholes who got us here to lead us out of the mess they created. :|

Hey look, same non-answer 3 times.
I'm sure you'll have a great plan...it will sound something like this:

"well, we could have done something but now we can't and it's all Bush's fault". We'll continue the cycle of blaming the previous president for all of our woes.

Meanwhile, Iran will have gone nuclear, Saudi Arabia will follow closely behind. But hey, you'll have got your impeachment and endless investigations! Heck, you might even pass a minimum wage raise (if those darn republicans will stop fillibustering you at every turn), and we can fight over universal healthcare some more! You'll be in power, you'll have gotten revenge, and that's what important.

Yup, I can't wait for your kick-ass plan and turn in power to come around :roll:
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: alchemize
Now I ask you again for the 3rd (and last) time. how will the Dems "finish the job"?
*cricket* *cricket*
The sad answer remains the same. The Bushwhackos have left us no good options, just a lot of ugly ones, but the fact remains that they haven't YET been sent off to their well deserved retreat to the Guantanamo Hilton so that remains the first priority.

Regardless of what comes after that, the only fact that's patently clear is, we can't trust the same criminal assholes who got us here to lead us out of the mess they created. :|

That about sums it up. In the real world, people that fvck up like this are fired, and someone else is brought in to replace them. Then again this isn't the real world, its faith based government.

Apparently you don't work for a living. People screw up all the time in the real world. Eventually they get fired, but often times everyone has to pitch in to clean up the mess they created.

Or perhaps that's common to dems in the workplace - they go "ain't my fault he screwed up, I'm not helping clean up his mess till he gets fired". Hmm, maybe I'm seeing a trend here...

I do work for a living. Thanks for the personal attacks though. Considering you don't have anything else to go on, it might be your best course of action.

That's a personal attack? LOL...need a bandaid?

PS: going to withdraw your comment "No one is saying they "screwed america" (nice quote that never appears here btw)"?
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,212
9,007
136
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: alchemize
Now I ask you again for the 3rd (and last) time. how will the Dems "finish the job"?
*cricket* *cricket*
The sad answer remains the same. The Bushwhackos have left us no good options, just a lot of ugly ones, but the fact remains that they haven't YET been sent off to their well deserved retreat to the Guantanamo Hilton so that remains the first priority.

Regardless of what comes after that, the only fact that's patently clear is, we can't trust the same criminal assholes who got us here to lead us out of the mess they created. :|

That about sums it up. In the real world, people that fvck up like this are fired, and someone else is brought in to replace them. Then again this isn't the real world, its faith based government.

Apparently you don't work for a living. People screw up all the time in the real world. Eventually they get fired, but often times everyone has to pitch in to clean up the mess they created.

Or perhaps that's common to dems in the workplace - they go "ain't my fault he screwed up, I'm not helping clean up his mess till he gets fired". Hmm, maybe I'm seeing a trend here...

I do work for a living. Thanks for the personal attacks though. Considering you don't have anything else to go on, it might be your best course of action.

That's a personal attack? LOL...need a bandaid?

PS: going to withdraw your comment "No one is saying they "screwed america" (nice quote that never appears here btw)"?

Yeah, I'm so hurt. :confused: I forgot that having a rational discussion without making unfounded statements about people you know absolutely nothing about isn't allowed around here.

As for my comment, of course I'll withdraw it. Some of us can admit mistakes. Unless you'd like me to ask you what your plan is to fix it?
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,057
60
91
Originally posted by: alchemize
Hey look, same non-answer 3 times.
Hey look, same non-answer 3 times. I already answered you each time. If you're vision is impared, I'll put it in bold caps:

THERE AR NO GOOD ANSWERS FOR THE MESS THE BUSHWHACKOS CREATED! :(

Sorry there are no Braille tags on this forum.
I'm sure you'll have a great plan...it will sound something like this:

"well, we could have done something but now we can't and it's all Bush's fault". We'll continue the cycle of blaming the previous president for all of our woes.
Clue -- If you include the entire administration, including Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove, Wolfowitz, Perle, etc., then yes, it IS all Bush's fault. If you have a problem with the reality of that, it's your problem.
Meanwhile, Iran will have gone nuclear, Saudi Arabia will follow closely behind. But hey, you'll have got your impeachment and endless investigations!
Great analogy. I suppose you'll also want to skip pursuing and prosecuting all the other murderers, rapists and child molesters because you'd rather send all the cops and prosecutors after the mullahs in Iran.
Yup, I can't wait for your kick-ass plan and turn in power to come around :roll:
I can wait forever for yours. Your assholes have been in charge for six years, and all they've brought us is disaster after disaster followed by more disasters. Enough is already too much! :thumbsdown: :| :thumbsdown:
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Outriding said exactly that, unless of course he was confusing Iraq with afghanistan. That happens a lot when you're infected with antibushitis :D
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Too bad he didn't provide a pre-war or post-war solution.

And neither has/have any of his party.

This is Biden blowing more hot air, as usual. The guy's a tool.

 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,057
60
91
Originally posted by: alchemize
Outriding said exactly that, unless of course he was confusing Iraq with afghanistan. That happens a lot when you're infected with antibushitis :D
Bush and his band of criminals are the illness. Opposing their evil is the first step of the cure. :thumbsup: :cool: :thumbsup:
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Okay... Twenty something posts and nothing new...

Alright, forget all the bickering for a minute. Let's start fresh. It's 2008, and the Republicans are soundly defeated. The Democrats control both houses and are in the White House. You have all the legislative power needed to get whatever you want done. How do you do better?
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,212
9,007
136
To start, use intelligence info to shape policy, not shape the intelligence to fit the policy. Trust the subject matter experts, instead of alienating and ignoring them to the point where they quit (CIA/state/armed services). That would be a good start.
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Originally posted by: Pens1566
To start, use intelligence info to shape policy, not shape the intelligence to fit the policy. Trust the subject matter experts, instead of alienating and ignoring them to the point where they quit (CIA/state/armed services). That would be a good start.
Erm, do you have any policy aims that are not meant as a subtle jab to a departed administration? Or at least provide a little more detail? What are those newly-confident CIA experts going to do under the new administration?
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,212
9,007
136
Gather data, interpret it based on their knowledge and expertise, and give their best estimation as to what is true no matter what the administration wants to hear. CIA is supposed to be an apolitical, honest broker of fact based information.
 

outriding

Diamond Member
Feb 20, 2002
3,355
2,532
136
Originally posted by: alchemize
Outriding said exactly that, unless of course he was confusing Iraq with afghanistan. That happens a lot when you're infected with antibushitis :D


Confusing the two???

It was President Bush who made the connection not I.

I am just playing the NeoCon game: Bush says so, so it must be true and I will not listen to anything else.
 

Aisengard

Golden Member
Feb 25, 2005
1,558
0
76
yllus, What Pens proposed is automatically better than what we have now. It's not hard to come up with a policy better than the Bush Administration's.

And asking someone "how do we do better" is automatically calling for a comparison of this administration to a future one. So yeah, proposed solutions are going to be a change, and thus a criticism, of the previous administration.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,212
9,007
136
Originally posted by: Aisengard
yllus, What Pens proposed is automatically better than what we have now. It's not hard to come up with a policy better than the Bush Administration's.

And asking someone "how do we do better" is automatically calling for a comparison of this administration to a future one. So yeah, proposed solutions are going to be a change, and thus a criticism, of the previous administration.

I can't take credit for that plan. My two dogs came up with it, in between licking themselves.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: Pens1566
I can't take credit for that plan. My two dogs came up with it, in between licking themselves.

Self deprecation at its finest.