Jim Carrey just pooped on himself....

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
ch33zw1z

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,805
20,412
146
Haha, OP has lost interest in Carey, oh noes!!

My 12 YO and I started watching JC movies now that he's old enough. Good times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indus
S

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,002
126
If a conservative posted a pic of a liberal politician being aborted they'd probably be banned from the social media platform for hate speech. But since Carrey is an outspoken liberal, Twitter will probably give him a golden soy cuck award or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brandonbull
Homerboy

Homerboy

Lifer
Mar 1, 2000
30,890
5,001
126
Fox headline "Pro-abortion"
Nobody I have EVER met is "Pro-Abortion". You do realize the mind game they are trying to play with you using that headline, correct?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie and Jimzz
ch33zw1z

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,805
20,412
146
SlowSpyder said:
If a conservative posted a pic of a liberal politician being aborted they'd probably be banned from the social media platform for hate speech. But since Carrey is an outspoken liberal, Twitter will probably give him a golden soy cuck award or something.
Click to expand...

Cry moar.
 
balloonshark

balloonshark

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2008
7,212
3,659
136
It's sad that so many people in 2019 need Faux News to tell they how and what to think. I think this comes from when they went to church as children. They are taught to listen to and not question the man behind the podium who gave them his interpretation of the bible. They never questioned the preacher and now as adults they are repeating the same pattern.

The sad part is all media is owned and controlled by billionaires. They know this yet they don't question anything. How do you go through life without questioning everything?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie
M

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,818
6,778
126
Fox is a community center for the brain dead who need to be told what to think. It functions like a pig trough, feeding slop to the animals who have lost so much capacity for empathy they can think only of themselves. There they are told they are peacocks, the cream of the crop, holders of true wisdom, and that all will be will so long as they keep the one percent in power.
 
Hayabusa Rider

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
ch33zw1z said:
Cry moar.
Click to expand...

Being a lying racist piece of shit has consequences and his lot is the ones that fit that description. Wait until the Deutche bank documents and redacted Flynn papers and tape are made public. The Dems have nothing to do with Trump's actions it is a federal judge that, not the "Dems" who is ordering unredaction and public release. In the meantime the real crisis is a cartoon he doesn't like.

It will be interesting to see those who support Trump regardless of criminality react when the facts are recognized by all but them. The disconnect has to fall, eventually even if they refuse to own up.
 
dank69

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,455
33,160
136
SlowSpyder said:
If a conservative posted a pic of a liberal politician being aborted they'd probably be banned from the social media platform for hate speech. But since Carrey is an outspoken liberal, Twitter will probably give him a golden soy cuck award or something.
Click to expand...
Probably. Probably not.
 
Ichinisan

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
Homerboy said:
Fox headline "Pro-abortion"
Nobody I have EVER met is "Pro-Abortion". You do realize the mind game they are trying to play with you using that headline, correct?
Click to expand...
You are naive and ignorant.

I can't tell you how many times so-called "pro-choice" (pro-abortion) supporters have referred to pro-lifers as "anti-choice." Far more often than saying "anti-abortion." This is very disingenuous and downright funny that you can't see it.
 
Last edited:
dank69

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,455
33,160
136
Ichinisan said:
You are naive and ignorant.

I can't tell you how many times so-called "pro-choice" (pro-abortion) supporters have referred to pro-lifers as "anti-choice." Far more often than saying "anti-abortion." This is very disingenuous and downright funny that you can't see it.
Click to expand...
What the hell? Pro-lifers are trying to remove women's right to choose to get an abortion or not. They are by definition anti-choice. Meanwhile, most pro-choice people have no interest in increasing abortion. In fact, they just realize that there are much better ways to reduce their numbers than making it illegal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie
woolfe9998

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,243
136
dank69 said:
What the hell? Pro-lifers are trying to remove women's right to choose to get an abortion or not. They are by definition anti-choice. Meanwhile, most pro-choice people have no interest in increasing abortion. In fact, they just realize that there are much better ways to reduce their numbers than making it illegal.
Click to expand...

Agreed. While "anti-choice" puts a more negative cast on their position than does "pro-life" it is, nonetheless, factually accurate. Ichinisan, please explain why it isn't accurate.

By contrast, being pro-choice is just that, supporting the right to choose an abortion which is not the same thing as being pro-abortion. It's not very different than saying I support your right to smoke cigarettes even though I still think it's a bad idea.
 
Ichinisan

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
dank69 said:
What the hell? Pro-lifers are trying to remove women's right to choose to get an abortion or not. They are by definition anti-choice. Meanwhile, most pro-choice people have no interest in increasing abortion. In fact, they just realize that there are much better ways to reduce their numbers than making it illegal.
Click to expand...

You're doing the same thing. It's cognitive dissonance to convince yourself that this doesn't go both ways.

Pro-lifers are anti-baby-murder. They believe that, at some point at least, the "fetus" is an unborn baby and a human life deserving human rights and as much protection as a newborn child. You have to admit the point at which it deserves protection seems a bit arbitrary. If a government decides that a being (with a brain, beating heart, and DNA unique from the mother and father) isn't a human until some arbitrary point, well that isn't going to sit well with some people who don't see a rationale for selecting that point. The fact that the particular point can be decided, then debated and changed, is concerning. It's as if your human rights are granted by the government whenever they decide you deserve them.

In nearly all pregnancies, important choices are made before the point of conception. The choice to have unprotected sex. Also the choice to not take the "morning after" pill. Many pro-lifers still believe you should have a choice in cases of rape.
 
woolfe9998

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,243
136
Ichinisan said:
You're doing the same thing. It's cognitive dissonance to convince yourself that this doesn't go both ways.

Pro-lifers are anti-baby-murder. They believe that, at some point at least, the "fetus" is an unborn baby and a human life deserving human rights and as much protection as a newborn child. You have to admit the point at which it deserves protection seems a bit arbitrary. If a government decides that a being (with a brain, beating heart, and DNA unique from the mother and father) isn't a human until some arbitrary point, well that isn't going to sit well with some people who don't see a rationale for selecting that point. The fact that the particular point can be decided, then debated and changed, is concerning. It's as if your human rights are granted by the government whenever they decide you deserve them.

In nearly all pregnancies, important choices are made before the point of conception. The choice to have unprotected sex. Also the choice to not take the "morning after" pill. Many pro-lifers still believe you should have a choice in cases of rape.
Click to expand...

All of which sidesteps the issue under discussion, which is that there is no parallelism here because pro-lifers are anti-choice while pro-choicers aren't anti-abortion. I agree that both sides are employing semantics to cast themselves in a better light and the other in a poorer light. The difference is that only one side is being factually inaccurate, while the other is using an unflattering word choice which is, nonetheless, accurate.
 
glenn1

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
woolfe9998 said:
All of which sidesteps the issue under discussion, which is that there is no parallelism here because pro-lifers are anti-choice while pro-choicers aren't anti-abortion. I agree that both sides are employing semantics to cast themselves in a better light and the other in a poorer light. The difference is that only one side is being factually inaccurate, while the other is using an unflattering word choice which is, nonetheless, accurate.
Click to expand...

Pro choice is a poor euphemism when the choice involved is dismembering a fetus so the mother isn’t inconvenienced. It’s kinda like saying the Fugitive Slave laws weren’t about keeping people in bondage but was a “lost property service.” Maybe a good compromise is women get to have their abortions but they gotta run the vacuum themselves. People feel differently about things they need to kill themselves, the same idea that we’d eat less meat if you needed to put a bolt through the brain of a cow and butcher it yourself. Let the women fully own their choice and personally do the evil act instead of a doctor and dispose of the remains.
 
S

s0me0nesmind1

Lifer
Nov 8, 2012
20,842
4,785
146
I farking love liberal hollywood elites dousing us with their elite political e-peen opinions. It's great for making them feel like they are at our level in life.

"OPEN BORDERS!!!1one!! Immigration should be free!"
"So, wait, why do you live in a gated mansion again?"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom