Good question, CarbonyIXP. That question's been popping up over and over in my mind. But it especially was difficult for me 'cuz I grew up with this Western notion of the name "Jesus" being a holy name with which accompanied reverence for the person who bore it. And thus, we were not supposed to name or call anyone "Jesus" besides He.
Well, when I saw how many supposed Christian Hispanics bore that name and how it was not an issue in the churches with Hispanics with that name, I couldn't ever understand why it was still a taboo in the Western [Christian] culture.
Even up to date, I have difficulties calling anyone, Hispanic or not, by that name.

It's just an engraved taboo I have difficulty ridding myself of. I cannot conform to it and reconcile that fact from what we're often indoctrinated with in Western Christian belief.
For a moment, let's leave those facts insignificant, it is indeed logical that any ordinary Joe can bear that name since Jesus was not just bore by Jesus Christ. It was also bore by other parties during his era. At the same time, names have no reverence at all until a character who bears it does something recognised and remembered, so his name becomes sort of like a souvenir and one no one bears. So, it's really confusing to me.
Edit: Something just popped in my mind. If you note, we do not seem to care much if an equivalent of a name we revere is used in whatever manner in another language when translated. So it is as though saying it only in the English language is what is transgressive. It seems as if we regard the English language as the holy and universal language for our belief. It is this language from whence stems what is holy and what is not. I guess that's the closest to a sensible answer I got.
