• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Jenny McCarthy Says She's Pro-Vaccine

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Sea Ray said:
As if class wasn't enough, another difference between you and me is that I don't hurl names at people I disagree with. But don't take that too hard...you're not the only one around here who's into name calling. Here's a tip: it doesn't help your case. In fact it shows how you lost...
Click to expand...

There is one person here who willfully put their family and the people around them in potential danger by delaying the appropriate vaccinations based on specious reasoning.

The definition of 'fool': a person who acts unwisely or imprudently; a silly person.

Yep, seems appropriate...
 
dank69 said:
They are given in groups because they should be administered as early as possible...
Click to expand...

...and I'm sure eventually, there will be advocates that suggest we juice-up these kids in-utero! They will profess that the maternal transfer of immunity to the newborn is negligible and at most ineffective and hence, these newborns need supplemental boosters in order to survive. ()🙂
 
Victorian Gray said:
There is one person here who willfully put their family and the people around them in potential danger by delaying the appropriate vaccinations based on specious reasoning.

The definition of 'fool': a person who acts unwisely or imprudently; a silly person.

Yep, seems appropriate...
Click to expand...
Yes, the wise man knows how many plagues are spread by two year olds at home with Mom. It's a wonder we even allow those little Typhoid Mary's to live.
 
Victorian Gray said:
C'mon, you understand germ theory and the way disease is spread better than that.
Click to expand...
I do, but babies with stay-at-home moms in the country just don't get around much. We don't do play dates or parks; we have our own yards and fields. There just aren't many more people in contact with two year olds compared to one year olds for us. Day care or school is where high density contact with strangers begins for most kids in the country.
 
LegendKiller said:
But my point is that the impact of stopping any one of those things is negligible in comparison to anti-vaxxers and has as much grounding in science as the anti-vaxxers or evne your ridiculous points. One has massive societal impacts, the other does not, both have no grounding in science.

The bigger point is that it could be any one of those things, all of which have probably just as strong of a correlation to your idiotic meta-data study and are likely not even the cause. Furthermore, moronic parents would rather blame some exogenous variable, like "big pharma" than themselves, or at least even be introspective about it.
Click to expand...

I disagree with you that in today's world, my waiting until my kid is 3 to get vaccinated is a significant risk. Thanks to most of us being vaccinated, there's not much of these bugs going around. Waiting a couple years is no big deal nor will it have as you put it "massive societal impacts".
 
Victorian Gray said:
There is one person here who willfully put their family and the people around them in potential danger by delaying the appropriate vaccinations based on specious reasoning.

The definition of 'fool': a person who acts unwisely or imprudently; a silly person.

Yep, seems appropriate...
Click to expand...

You think the amount of danger in waiting two years is significant enough to call someone names? The risk was minimal. Thanks for your concern but we slept just fine during those years
 
Sea Ray said:
You think the amount of danger in waiting two years is significant enough to call someone names? The risk was minimal. Thanks for your concern but we slept just fine during those years
Click to expand...

Sea Ray said:
You're the one who seems very uneducated about this whole thing. I wish my life were so simple so I could spend my energies worrying about such trivial things
Click to expand...
if you're not going to contribute anything resembling intelligent discussion, please stop trolling and GTFO.
 
Iron Woode said:
if you're not going to contribute anything resembling intelligent discussion, please stop trolling and GTFO.
Click to expand...

And THAT qualifies as intelligent discussion?

What is it about you Canadians? I know it's been a long, hard winter all but ...get some fresh air
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top