Jackson's accuser did it for money

[housecat]

http://celebrityjustice.warner...com/news/0501/03a.html

I dont support the guy, but I'm not against him either. Innocent until proven guilty.

The guy has gotten his criticism both warranted, and unnecessary (plenty).

My view is: if Jackson is such a frickin criminal with a PROBLEM, then why not HELP him instead of seek money?

Shouldnt the parents of these children be seeking him to join therapy and counciling instead of trying to take his money... ? All in the name of their poor neglected children that were spoiled rotten by Jackson..

oh and Jackson took damn good care of the parents too from what I've read.
Theres alot of talk about the lawsuit, but not much about the "poor and hurt children".. no one cares about the kids, especially not the parents.. its just about money.

Just another scam pushed around by lawyers looking to rob someone, even if he did do it.

 

[Aimster]

fingerprints of the victims on porn magazines in Jackson's bedroom!

 

[Zap Brannigan]

I bought Thriller last week. It's a really good album minus the Paul Mcartney bit.

 

[Zap Brannigan]

For some reason I can't picture that guy with any sex drive at all.

Regardless his talent as an entertainer has been proven; no doubts there.

 

[Colt45]

<Michael Jackson noise that i don't know how to spell>

 

[Zap Brannigan]

Prince can do it too! Both are distinct sounding though.

 

[Rogue]

Is the house of cards tumbling down? It's not too far fetched to think that the magazine was planted in my opinion. I guess the jury will sort it out though. I don't know one way or the other at this point.

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: Rogue
Is the house of cards tumbling down? It's not too far fetched to think that the magazine was planted in my opinion. I guess the jury will sort it out though. I don't know one way or the other at this point.

It could have been. He invites thousands of people there all the time. Who knows if someone working with that kid didn't sneak in and put it there.

 

[housecat]

The magazine IMO means nothing. So the kid looked at one of Jackson's porns?

Think of it this way, you have a porn mag in your bathroom.. some kid comes over and looks at it.. all of the sudden that is evidence in you molesting him? :roll:




I prob sound like a huge jackson defender.. but I'm really not.. I jsut think the guy gets severely screwed by the media and ppl hunting for dough..

i say prove it beyaches.. and it will take much more than a fingerprint on Jacksons pornz. they said the kids came over to his house all the time when he wasnt there...