Well you see, I can consciously make the choice to bang a chick, but then my dick won't want to become erect when the time comes. I can yell at my dick and punish it, but it doesn't seem very effective.
I'm sure you get erections just fine with the thought of another mans cock in your mouth, but choose to not suck one. :awe:
Sure I could get a hardon while thinking of another dudes cock in my mouth, all I'd have to do was play with my dick. I could easily bang a dude, as well, if I chose to do so. I merely choose not to.
If you are unable to find a way to make your dick hard at will, then perhaps you should see a doctor.
Why do you choose not too? What is stopping you?Sure I could get a hardon while thinking of another dudes cock in my mouth, all I'd have to do was play with my dick. I could easily bang a dude, as well, if I chose to do so. I merely choose not to.
I doubt anything is wrong with his dick. And the only reason yours would get hard while thinking of man on man porn is because you yourself would have to manually stimulate it, as you've said.If you are unable to find a way to make your dick hard at will, then perhaps you should see a doctor.
Is it impossible for a gay person to bang someone of the opposite sex? No. Then being gay is a choice.
Oh god a quote for the ages....
Let me tell you I can't get a hard on with the thought of a girls boob or vagina in my mind even if I play with my dick. If I did, it would be despite the thought, not because of it. And to do so, would mean I would have been hard regardless of the situation due to long gap from last copulation, which indicates an extreme lack of choice in the erection.
Do you know what the difference is between an aid versus a hindrance?
Faulty conclusion. Being gay and committing a gay act are not the same thing.
In the past, many gay men married women and had children. This never made them straight, they were always gay.
Being gay is not a choice. Blowing your postman is.
Faulty conclusion. Being gay and committing a gay act are not the same thing.
In the past, many gay men married women and had children. This never made them straight, they were always gay.
Being gay is not a choice. Blowing your postman is.
Do you understand the difference between a choice and not having a choice?
Your problem is conditioning, not that you have no choice in the matter.
Faulty conclusion. Being gay and committing a gay act are not the same thing.
In the past, many gay men married women and had children. This never made them straight, they were always gay.
Being gay is not a choice. Blowing your postman is.
We're all gay to some degree or another. It's been clearly delineated again and again. Saying someone is gay or straight demonstrates about the same level of sophistication as saying someone is of a particular race.
We're all gay to some degree or another. It's been clearly delineated again and again. Saying someone is gay or straight demonstrates about the same level of sophistication as saying someone is of a particular race.
At any rate, the Shakespeare is the most pertinent information in this thread.
This is also basically true. In fact, most behavioral traits ascribed to humans on a discrete, either-or basis actually exist along a continuum.
It's another reason intelligent people do nuance.![]()
Sure I could get a hardon while thinking of another dudes cock in my mouth, all I'd have to do was play with my dick. I could easily bang a dude, as well, if I chose to do so. I merely choose not to.
If you are unable to find a way to make your dick hard at will, then perhaps you should see a doctor.
Can the bigoted gay debate be moved to it's own thread? Something like "Discuss mrjminer's gay-deology"?
That's actually fairly specious thought. It sounds good, but doesn't hold scientific water.This is also basically true. In fact, most behavioral traits ascribed to humans on a discrete, either-or basis actually exist along a continuum.
It's another reason intelligent people do nuance.![]()
In reality, most people primarily pursue one or the other sex, even when they identify as bisexual.
This is also basically true. In fact, most behavioral traits ascribed to humans on a discrete, either-or basis actually exist along a continuum.
It's another reason intelligent people do nuance.![]()
Shouldn't that be:
"In fact, most behavioral traits ascribed to humans on a discrete either or basis, actually exist along a continuum."?
Nothing you said gainsays the bolded.
In fact, your lone logical example tends to support it.![]()
Shakespeare is overrated. I saw midsummer nights dream a few weeks ago andwas shad such an uninteresting libretto, though britten was no composing genius either in my opinion.
Can the bigoted gay debate be moved to it's own thread? Something like "Discuss mrjminer's gay-deology"?
"Going postal" just took on a whole new meaning.Being gay is not a choice. Blowing your postman is.
