It's still a Neon

[SgtBuddy]

It's still a Neon.

WRX vs Neon

Right Click...yadda yadda

I drive a Neon.

 

[ndee]

the STi was faster in the 2nd 45-roll run. But the quality really sux of the video.

 

[Snapster]

Guy clearly can't shift!

 

[SgtBuddy]

Originally posted by: ndee
the STi was faster in the 2nd 45-roll run. But the quality really sux of the video.

$10K faster?

 

[Turkish]

Originally posted by: SgtBuddy

Originally posted by: ndee
the STi was faster in the 2nd 45-roll run. But the quality really sux of the video.

$10K faster?

$10K more fun. I don't want a piece of sh!t car that can't handle for god's sake....

 

[ndee]

Originally posted by: SgtBuddy

Originally posted by: ndee
the STi was faster in the 2nd 45-roll run. But the quality really sux of the video.

$10K faster?

It's an AWD -> fuuuuuuun

 

[MAME]

I can't see a damn thing :|

 

[thedarkwolf]

Originally posted by: Xiety

Originally posted by: SgtBuddy

Originally posted by: ndee
the STi was faster in the 2nd 45-roll run. But the quality really sux of the video.

$10K faster?

$10K more fun. I don't want a piece of sh!t car that can't handle for god's sake....

Where did you get that the srt-4 can't handle? They handle quite well.

 

[dtmbb92]

Originally posted by: MAME
I can't see a damn thing :|

 

[StageLeft]

Originally posted by: thedarkwolf

Originally posted by: Xiety

Originally posted by: SgtBuddy

Originally posted by: ndee
the STi was faster in the 2nd 45-roll run. But the quality really sux of the video.

$10K faster?

$10K more fun. I don't want a piece of sh!t car that can't handle for god's sake....

Where did you get that the srt-4 can't handle? They handle quite well.

Probably decent, but badly for a small car with that much horsepower. Surely the Sti/evo, etc. would smoke it given that they are not a high-powered front wheel drive platform (which as we all know rather sucks for performance compared to awd or rwd).

Still, for $20k these srt4 are very impressive in the speed they can produce.

 

[EXman]

people who supe it Neons or buy premodded fast ones make me laugh.

the fart can on back are the funniest. Cause they are trash

 

[mztykal]

I'd take the SRT-4 and throw 10k worth of upgrades on it. It's still a Neon, but it'll eat up a lot of cars.

 

[thedarkwolf]

SRT-4
0-60 mph: 5.9 sec
0-100 mph: --.- sec
Quarter Mile: 14.2 sec @ 99.5 mph
Skidpad: .85g
Top Speed: 148 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph: 119 ft
Slalom Speed: 69.0 mph

STI and EVO
2004 Subaru WRX STi
0-60 mph, sec 4.87
1/4-mile, sec@mph 13.23@104.6
Braking, 60-0, ft 111
600-ft slalom, mph 69.1


2003 Mitsubishi Evolution
0-60 4.59
1/4 13.08@105.1
braking 106
slalom 71.4

Skid pad #s for both are .88g

going by this PDF

So no they don't handle all that much better than a SRT-4

 

[thedarkwolf]

Originally posted by: EXman
people who supe it Neons or buy premodded fast ones make me laugh.

the fart can on back are the funniest. Cause they are trash

SRT-4s don't have fart cans. They do have fake dual exhaust though and no mufflers.

 

[geno]

And it's still an Impreza, yep, that's right, they're both tarted up Economy cars

 

[geno]

Originally posted by: mztykal
I'd take the SRT-4 and throw 10k worth of upgrades on it. It's still a Neon, but it'll eat up a lot of cars.

$1200 worth of mods put someone I know into the 12's with one.
Timeslip (SRT4 on the left, WRX STi on the right)

 

[ndee]

Originally posted by: geno
And it's still an Impreza, yep, that's right, they're both tarted up Economy cars

Ever seen some Rally? I think they made the Rally car FIRST IIRC