It's high time that Trump releases his taxes

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,060
24,366
136
It should be an obligation at this point. When you have hundreds of businesses with interests in many countries where foreign policy by the Federal Government can make an effect, it should be part of the disclosure of the presidency. Trump is a specialized case but I would support that any president of the USA, now and going forward, has to release their tax returns every year while in office. Just to keep it even steven.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MongGrel

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Why don't we just get to the point?

Dems/libs don't like businesses (evil corporate greed and what not) and want gov run by 'professional politicians'.

Just get to the point and make it illegal for any business person to run for office and require that candidates be prof politicians.

Fern
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,697
6,257
126
Why don't we just get to the point?

Dems/libs don't like businesses (evil corporate greed and what not) and want gov run by 'professional politicians'.

Just get to the point and make it illegal for any business person to run for office and require that candidates be prof politicians.

Fern

That's the point?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,703
54,697
136
Why don't we just get to the point?

Dems/libs don't like businesses (evil corporate greed and what not) and want gov run by 'professional politicians'.

Just get to the point and make it illegal for any business person to run for office and require that candidates be prof politicians.

Fern

This is a pretty weird and crazed rant. How about it is totally normal and rational to want to know the financial interests of someone in charge of the county? There is a reason why presidents ALWAYS have disclosed their tax filings for decades and decades.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,060
24,366
136
Why don't we just get to the point?

Dems/libs don't like businesses (evil corporate greed and what not) and want gov run by 'professional politicians'.

Just get to the point and make it illegal for any business person to run for office and require that candidates be prof politicians.

Fern


That's one of the most ridiculous leap's of assumption I have ever seen on this forum. Wanting the office of the presidency not to have major conflicts of interest at numerous turns and swerves has nothing to do with supporting businesses or not. That is asinine. The two are ideologically separate.

By all means, be a businessman and run for office. I have no qualms with that - Dem or Repub or Independent.

There is a thing called a blind trust. If you want to sit in the highest position in the country then be prepared to use it. If you aren't, then don't run. There are plenty who will. That sounds fair enough.
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,225
664
126
Why don't we just get to the point?

Dems/libs don't like businesses (evil corporate greed and what not) and want gov run by 'professional politicians'.

Just get to the point and make it illegal for any business person to run for office and require that candidates be prof politicians.

Fern

Nice to hear you speak for everyone. Too bad you're wrong. Keep up the deflection though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MongGrel

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,703
54,697
136
That's one of the most ridiculous leap's of assumption I have ever seen on this forum. Wanting the office of the presidency not to have major conflicts of interest at numerous turns and swerves has nothing to do with supporting businesses or not. That is asinine. The two are ideologically separate.

By all means, be a businessman and run for office. I have no qualms with that - Dem or Repub or Independent.

There is a thing called a blind trust. If you want to sit in the highest position in the country then be prepared to use it. If you aren't, then don't run. There are plenty who will. That sounds fair enough.

I swear at one point, many years ago, Fern used to be sane. He went from being an interesting and thoughtful poster that I tended to disagree with to a birther and a guy who makes rants like this.

Sad!
 

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
Why don't we just get to the point?

Dems/libs don't like businesses (evil corporate greed and what not) and want gov run by 'professional politicians'.

Just get to the point and make it illegal for any business person to run for office and require that candidates be prof politicians.

Fern
Triggered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Homerboy

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Because Trump promised he would, and said in the past that other candidates should?

That's crazy talk!
 
  • Like
Reactions: KMFJD

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
Don't hold your breath waiting. Or, on second thought...

It's somewhat cute that the proggie/left still think they can dictate what people should do though.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
Don't hold your breath waiting. Or, on second thought...

It's somewhat cute that the proggie/left still think they can dictate what people should do though.

It's somewhat cute you think Trump gives a crap about you, and you think he does not want to dictate what people do.

He's not exactly a Liberterian, is he :)

He wants no one looking at his tax returns, in public, of course.
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,225
664
126
So we agree the "audit" story when it comes to his taxes is just another bald face lie.

No no, the audit will go on for another 4 - 8 years and his lawyers told him not to release them while the audit is ongoing.

But in the event the audit is over sooner, he'll release those returns just like he promised to. Right?
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,817
31,868
136
Jman

Did a little digging last night. IRS regs say statue of limitations on tax cases is 3 years. It also states the IRS has 3 years from the time a return is filed to adjudicate any audit. If they are not finished the case is dropped.

That means Trumps returns from the years 2013 and earlier are available.

Two questions I have...

Does this apply to corporate returns?
Is there any circumstance an audit could exceed 3 years?

Maybe someone in this forum who is a tax expert can answer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jman19

paperfist

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2000
6,539
286
126
www.the-teh.com
That's one of the most ridiculous leap's of assumption I have ever seen on this forum. Wanting the office of the presidency not to have major conflicts of interest at numerous turns and swerves has nothing to do with supporting businesses or not. That is asinine. The two are ideologically separate.

By all means, be a businessman and run for office. I have no qualms with that - Dem or Repub or Independent.

There is a thing called a blind trust. If you want to sit in the highest position in the country then be prepared to use it. If you aren't, then don't run. There are plenty who will. That sounds fair enough.

Kinda late to want him to release his taxes now anyway?

What's the point anyone who's ever been in office or a politician in general is crooked.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,884
4,885
136
Why don't we just get to the point?

Dems/libs don't like businesses (evil corporate greed and what not) and want gov run by 'professional politicians'.

Just get to the point and make it illegal for any business person to run for office and require that candidates be prof politicians.

Fern
Well that escalated quickly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MongGrel

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
Kinda late to want him to release his taxes now anyway?

What's the point anyone who's ever been in office or a politician in general is crooked.

It's never too late to know more about the man who will be running the country.

Your cynicism is noted along with its related apathy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paperfist

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,416
10,009
136
Why don't we just get to the point?

Dems/libs don't like businesses (evil corporate greed and what not) and want gov run by 'professional politicians'.

Just get to the point and make it illegal for any business person to run for office and require that candidates be prof politicians.

Fern
Why don't we just get to the point?

GOP/Trumpers don't like functional government (gets in the way of capitalist greed and what not) and want gov run by self-interested tyrants.

Just get to the point and make it illegal to voice any dissent and require that candidates be corporate sponsored.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
Don't hold your breath waiting. Or, on second thought...

It's somewhat cute that the proggie/left still think they can dictate what people should do though.

How dare people ask their politicians to rule out conflicts of interest, particularly for politicians that have an abundance of potential conflicts? Just sit down, shut up and become a mindless drone that accepts corruption without question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MongGrel

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
25,763
15,246
136
How come Trumps pisscascades is easier to 'leak' than his damned taxes? I am sure wikileaks must have them by now. Crooked wikileaks. Very unfair!