Well with the current RAM prices we will see 32c/64t with 32GB RAM? o really?
to achieve acceptable single core/low core count performance it will draw 250W+ imo
why not to push 16cores higher than this useless nonsense of 32c/64t desktop machine (my opinion, not talking about that skl-x furnace)
when I bought Athlon XP 1700+ throughbred it was like 35W CPU with high oc potential, but you could use it as power efficient and high perf cpu with like 70W
when I got c2d e6300 and oced it with default voltage from 1,86GHZ to 3.16GHz it took like 50-60W with top of the top performance
now we are looking at more cores with less performance on the desktop with more power- but not just more power- like 150-300W (doesnt matter if intel or AMD )
reminds me of something (car fuel and emission measuring metric)
to achieve acceptable single core/low core count performance it will draw 250W+ imo
why not to push 16cores higher than this useless nonsense of 32c/64t desktop machine (my opinion, not talking about that skl-x furnace)
when I bought Athlon XP 1700+ throughbred it was like 35W CPU with high oc potential, but you could use it as power efficient and high perf cpu with like 70W
when I got c2d e6300 and oced it with default voltage from 1,86GHZ to 3.16GHz it took like 50-60W with top of the top performance
now we are looking at more cores with less performance on the desktop with more power- but not just more power- like 150-300W (doesnt matter if intel or AMD )
reminds me of something (car fuel and emission measuring metric)
Last edited: