Not surprisingly, the UN disagrees with you:
http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2011/gov2011-65.pdf
Your failure to recognize that the IAEA and the Security Council work hand-in-hand with each other and your penchant to focus solely on the NPT, as if nothing else has meaning, is the real circular reasoning being employed in here.
We've just been through nearly a decade of war and Afghanistan won't officially be over for another 2 years. People are focused on the economy right now and the last thing they want is another war.
They've already given the IAEA the finger so it doesn't seem to matter whether the IAEA is there or not. Iran is going to do whatever it seems to want to do anyway. At least that's the message they have been sending.
My nose is miles and miles long, Jhhnn. I use it to sniff out your BS. Works really well.
Heh. Of course the Security Council claims what they say is binding, and yet, by your own admission, they won't sanction enforcement, nor have they endorsed the latest US/EU sanctions, either.
Treaties are the international version of contracts based on mutual consent. Changing one means mutual consent, as well, which is apparently the part you refuse to recognize. The fact that Iran has allowed IAEA inspection of facilities where nuclear materials haven't even been alleged to have existed is a major concession on their part. Parchin is one of them, and the IAEA has been there twice, with the Iranians currently agreeing to another pass.
Of course the US is weary of pointless war, but that doesn't mean we won't defend our nasty little mid eastern dog, Israel, if it gets off the leash & bites somebody. It's already growling, lunging, snapping, pulling at that leash for all it's worth.
Iran gave the IAEA the finger? Really? You agree with Netanyahu that they're working feverishly to create HEU & nuclear weapons?
I don't think so, nor has the IAEA offered that they are, either.
Your desperation is showing when you offer that it doesn't matter if the IAEA is in Iran or not. It matters a lot, because their presence promotes peace, reduces the chances of miscalculation, injects some facts into a situation otherwise driven by propaganda.