Originally posted by: dexvx
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
I don?t care if Hizbollah throws so much as a stone. They are Islamic extremists who have shown themselves to be at war to kill Israel and the USA and the ONLY action they can take that I will not denounce would be for them to surrender. If they refuse to surrender then I don't care if every last one of them has to be killed.
Actually Hezbollah is quite peaceful to the USA during the Israeli/Hez conflict. They allowed for the safe evacuation of US citizens during the ordeal. If they wanted to, they could've easily killed thousands of US Citizens and marines during the evac.
But hey, lets overlook that fact.
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
I'm continuously amazed at American support for Israel- They're an aggressive apartheid state based on ethno-religious superiority and biblical voodoo- utterly racist, and willing to resort to almost any means to achieve their ends....
How would we feel about them if they weren't Jewish? If there wasn't the underlying Holocaust guilt trip that causes us to turn away from the truth?
Originally posted by: chcarnage
Cluster bombs are a real worry in Lebanon. International teams so far defused about 500 dud "bomblets". It is estimated that a few thousand duds are left, spread in lebanon. Cluster bomblets have led to 20 post-war civil casualties so far. I think cluster bombs should become illegal too, because of their high dud rate and inaccuracy.
His death brings the total number of recorded victims of cluster bomb explosions in Lebanon since the conflict began to 21, with another 100 injured, according to the United Nations.
Israel has been accused by both the UN and human rights groups of firing up to four million cluster bombs into Lebanon during its war with Hizbollah, which ended in a UN-brokered ceasefire on 14 August.
UN de-mining experts say up to one million of the cluster bombs failed to explode immediately and continue to threaten civilians, especially children who can mistake the ordnance for batteries or other small objects.
Originally posted by: chcarnage
White phosphorus isn't entirely banned but the Red Cross and other human rights organisations want to ban it because of the severe burns it causes. The last to use WP were the US in Falluja in 2004. Both armies argued with the legality of WP and initially said they use it for "battlefield illumination".
Cluster bombs are a real worry in Lebanon. International teams so far defused about 500 dud "bomblets". It is estimated that a few thousand duds are left, spread in lebanon. Cluster bomblets have led to 20 post-war civil casualties so far. I think cluster bombs should become illegal too, because of their high dud rate and inaccuracy.
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: International Machine Consortium
Both Israel and the U.S. have used banned weapons. It suits our rogue state image nicely, no? Thanks, Republicans! I always wanted to be hated by the entire World! (well, Israel is our friend. Wait, they've been caught spying on us, selling our weapons system technology codes to the Chinese and undermining our credibility for years...)
What banned weapons have we used?
Oh, and I guess Democrats neeeeever do anything like fire missles into civilian aspirin factories, do they.
/snicker
Originally posted by: BrownTown
So, yeah did Isreal even sign the Geneva contvetion?
EDIT: and the answer is yes. Too bad nobody enforces these "laws" and therefore nobody actually follows them.
The International Red Cross is of the opinion that there should be a complete ban on phosphorus being used against human beings and the third protocol of the Geneva Convention on Conventional Weapons restricts the use of "incendiary weapons," with phosphorus considered to be one such weapon.
Israel and the United States are not signatories to the Third Protocol.
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
I'm continuously amazed at American support for Israel- They're an aggressive apartheid state based on ethno-religious superiority and biblical voodoo- utterly racist, and willing to resort to almost any means to achieve their ends....
How would we feel about them if they weren't Jewish? If there wasn't the underlying Holocaust guilt trip that causes us to turn away from the truth?
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
Interesting that you don't actually comment on the veracity of what I claimed, DNA, but rather attempt to divert discussion away from it by making it personal...
Maybe you'd care to comment on this-
http://www.alternet.org/story/39748/?comments=view&cID=170200&pID=169880
Notice the presence of Benny Elon... In the context of this, the Elon Peace Plan-
http://www.geocities.com/letisraelwin/ElonPlan.html
Which obviously isn't any kind of apartheid, is it? And wouldn't cause any bloodshed at all as the Israelis did a little "ethnic cleansing" of their own... Why, no, the Pals should be grateful that God's Chosen have allowed them to escape with their lives, and maybe whatever they can carry...
It's all according to prophesy, after all, and that couldn't possibly be wrong...
Originally posted by: dna
What a bunch of jokers: can't make an argument based on real-world facts, so they start babbeling about loony-bible-voodoo matters.
Even that pseudo-comparison to China doesn't hold, as there are plenty "dissenters" in Israel, and unlike in China, they don't disappear into forced labor camps, nor do they get charged with treason, convicted, executed, and cremated -- all before you could count to ten.
Originally posted by: dna
For all of you still masturbating over the news of a little bit of WP:
Hezbollah used cluster munitions in war with Israel: HRW
Originally posted by: chcarnage
Show me a source before playing this down as a "little bit". So far we don't know how much WP was used.
Wrong: Arabs are not required to serve, but a few do.There are no Arab Israeli in the IDF but that's about it.
I lean left on some issues, this isn't one of them. I'm very pro-Israel and the anti-Israel propaganda campaign has been continuously ramping up steadily, so :thumbsup: for you guys who are actively fighting agaisnt it.Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: Genx87
Next thing you will hear is Israel used chemical weapons(bullets).
White phosperous is used in more than a few situations. From target rounds, to smoke grenades, to burning troops out of their dug in positions.
Why people get all up an arms over it is purely political. Is dropping this on the enemy worse than blasting their brains out with a bullet?
If you're not going to hold the moral upper-ground then what have you become? Are you no better than them? If the answer is no, then phuk the Geneva Convention. Who knows, since you're willing to discard it, maybe the terrorists will choose the moral higher ground.
Well, if you're fighting terrorists, then every corner of the country is a "military ground." So much for "maximum restraint." Pathetic.
What does the moral upper hand get you when you have lost the right to live?
The answer is nothing. Having the moral upper ground in a war restricts your ability to wage it.
See Vietnam
See Iraq today
We held no moral higher ground in WWII and won decisivley.
I can?t help but get the feeling that they?re rooting for Hizbollah Genx87. Always fighting for them against Israel, down to the very last argument. Apparently chants of "death to Israel? and "death to America? are what it takes to win liberals over to ones side of the arguments.
Originally posted by: chcarnage
Originally posted by: dna
For all of you still masturbating over the news of a little bit of WP:
Hezbollah used cluster munitions in war with Israel: HRW
Show me a source before playing this down as a "little bit". So far we don't know how much WP was used.
Hezbollah using Chinese cluster rockets is bad news and a demonstration that this organisation is dangerous and knows where to get its arms. However the IDF used more cluster bombs. Hezbollah fired about 4000 rockets of which i believe fairly few were carrying bomblets. Israel on the other hand used about 1800 cluster bombs, delivering about 1.2 million bomblets (source). The IDF launched most of the cluster bombs in the last three days of the conflict (source). The IDF used cluster bombs in 1982, too (source).
ps. Of course this is nothing compared with the atrocities of China and obviously there is no Apartheid in Israel... There are no Arab Israeli in the IDF but that's about it. It's just that I sometimes wonder how conflicts involving a democracy can countinue for so much time... I wish I had an instant solution to the Middle East problems but I don't... So I just think it's bad advice to Israel to use such unpredictable weapons like WP and cluster bombs.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Comparing the use of phosphorus with the use of gas attacks that killed THOUSANDS of civilians?
GIVE ME A BREAK.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
I wonder, what does the convention say about terrorist attacks or launching rockets at civilians?
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Comparing the use of phosphorus with the use of gas attacks that killed THOUSANDS of civilians?
GIVE ME A BREAK.
Also note the line
Israel contents the used the weapon against military targets in "open ground" clearly not a violation of the convention (as stated above)The Geneva Conventions ban the use of white phosphorus as an incendiary weapon against civilian populations and in air attacks against military forces in civilian areas.
I wonder, what does the convention say about terrorist attacks or launching rockets at civilians?
:thumbsup:
