Originally posted by: cmetz
montypythizzle, the primary advantage to T1s is that they are a telco-grade service. They are strictly regulated for things like reliability, and they can theoretically deliver them anywhere there's a copper or SONET connection (but in some cases they'll have to do "special construction" and it will cost an arm and a leg and take many months). T1s have in-band and out-of-band reliability monitoring and testing capabilities, which help with remotely diagnosting problems.
In the long run, of course, data T1s will be replaced by newer technologies. In the business world, I'm seeing more and more buildings with fiber-based Ethernet services (either direct Ethernet MAN or Ethernet-in-SONET). This allows providers to deliver one tail circuit and deliver IP service with a delivered speed that can be dialed up or down using things like traffic shaping, or they can just do a fat best-effort service and be done with it. This approach pretty much only works where there's fiber into your building, or sometimes if there's fiber nearby and you're willing to write a big special construction check.
spidey07, don't know where you are; I'm in Verizon territory. Instead of proactive monitoring we have deceit and denial. And some of the CLECs are even worse. One in particular has a special place in my heart. My service is down, everyone in the building is down, the ONS 15k has "CRIT" and "MAJ" lights on, and their opening position is that they see no problems.