is your daily job affected by SOX?

[vital]

anyone else hate S0X? This is all Enron's fault!

 

[Raiden256]

I swear there was a thread asking this exact same question a month or two ago, but I'll be damned if I can find it.

(And, YES... it sucks.)

 

[KLin]

don't forget to blame worldcom and tyco also.

 

[BurnItDwn]

SOx has created some extra workload for me and the other guys in the department.
After the initial changes, we've for the most part gotten used to it though.

 

[shuttleboi]

I hate SOX. I despise SHOES too.

 

[dethman]

that's why that one guy wears no sox.

 

[Insane3D]

I'm glad my company and the company that owns us are both privately owned, so we are not required to comply.

 

[Steve]

MLB's season is over. No problems.

 

[Aharami]

yes. very much so. nothing but BS documentation.

 

[AgentJean]

Originally posted by: shuttleboi
I hate SOX. I despise SHOES too.

I'm indifferent on SOX and SHOES. but I REALLY HATE, suits and ties.

 

[krunchykrome]

There are a couple of public companies I am interviewing with at the moment. SOX would definetly affect me in those positions.

 

[FoBoT]

no, not yet
not directlly

 

[vital]

Originally posted by: krunchykrome
There are a couple of public companies I am interviewing with at the moment. SOX would definetly affect me in those positions.

Don't forget about dealing w/ SOX Auditors as well

 

[shuttleboi]

I hate SOX compliance: no SOX, no SHOES, no SERVICE!
*zing!*

 

[Steve]

"Sarbanes-Oxley is also a law. Actually, it is more of a compliance. Currently a corporation must comply to rules. However, it is difficult for a corporation to comply. If corporations complied, they would not be able to increase the corporations profits; thus they would not be able to take care of the individual corporation. Currently, the problem facing corporations is how the corporation can best beat this governing law in order to capitalize on profits. The answer to this dilemma is a difficult one which corporations are working fix right now."