Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
BTW when are the Linux drivers getting WHQL certified. MUAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHA
Originally posted by: ScrewFace
You gotta be kidding me? nVidia's beta drivers are absolute garbage! I was using the WHQL 40.72's which are great but I decided to try the 43.45 betas and my 3DMark2001 score went from 14,587 to 10,715!!! Needless to say I'm back with the WHQL 40.72's. nVidia used to have the best drivers but not anymore, eh ATI?:disgust:
Originally posted by: TheSnowman
3dmark2001 is fairly indicative of dx gaming performace in general you know nemesismk2, it seems rather lame to me that you might ignore that.
Originally posted by: ScrewFace
Hey, nemesismk2! Why are you dissing Snowman by calling him Snotman? You must be one of those 13 year old punks who gets on the net when your mother and father aren't looking. You are a disgrace. Don't ever post here again.:|
Originally posted by: TheSnowman
ya i don't get upset about people joking around on names or because of some repressed homosexual tendances anyway, so no worries there. however nemesismk2; i am not going to waste my time to "prove it" to you when you can go look around at benchmarks all over the place and note that 3dmark2k1 standings have a tendency to relate directly to the performance deltas in many other games. also note that 3dmark2k1 uses rendering techniques which are fairly common thought the industry which is exactly why the benchmark compares well with real world performance. granted there are exceptions to such things, but that just like like the fact that q3 scores will not give always be a good indicator of rtcw performance; that does not change the fact that it is often a very valid comparison.