Is this what Leftists want-Chicago?

[GettyRoad]

I am an independent. A centrist. Both parties have done crazy things. However, leftist groups in the past have always caused violence on the streets-Black Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street, Ferguson, Baltimore, Staten Island, McKinney, Tex., this is about agitation.

I have no problem with protests, but why did these leftist groups have to agitate the situation at Trump's Chicago, Illinois rally? And you want to know why these groups (A.N.S.W.E.R), Communist Party of America, Black Lives Matter, are not allowed in the suburban enclaves? It's not right!

 

[nickqt]

I am an independent. A centrist. Both parties have done crazy things. However, leftist groups in the past have always caused violence on the streets-Black Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street, Ferguson, Baltimore, Staten Island, McKinney, Tex., this is about agitation.

I have no problem with protests, but why did these leftist groups have to agitate the situation at Trump's Chicago, Illinois rally? And you want to know why these groups (A.N.S.W.E.R), Communist Party of America, Black Lives Matter, are not allowed in the suburban enclaves? It's not right!

Hilarious analysis.

Please proceed, BothSidesDoIt™ Independent.

 

[mizzou]

The agitation is because it gets views, hits, shares, fame. What it doesn't get is results, but who cares? YOLO!

I am quickly becoming a conservative out of complete disagreement with modern day left protest movements. I just don't get it. I would venture a guess and say that Trump is gaining steam and continues to lead because people view him as the only one with some strength to actually hold criminals accountable for their actions.

This all started with the occupy movement, and it is out of control now. It is good to let these movements have their say, but it's time to push back because they are now restricting 1st amendment rights of peaceful civilians.

I'll throw Cliven Bundy in the mix too. I've had enough with people stomping over others.

 

[SP33Demon]

It's because Trump holds power over them. They fear him for some reason. Half of them thinks he hates hispanics when that's not the case at all, he employs hundreds of them and even won the NV hispanic vote. He has Ben Carson (a black) endorsing him now.

I think the media is partly to blame. For example, CNN. Go there and look at what has been one of their main links on the top left for the past day and a half: "Man at N.C. Trump rally:'We might have to kill black protester'. So out of all the news that happened in the past 2 days (this happened on the 9th), that is the most important thing to keep on the front page? Of course, because the media wants to incite people. I bet if you took soundbites of Bernie or Hillary supporters, many of them say dumb shit like that as well. But only media sites like CNN will leave hateful stuff up there for over a day. It's despicable that they want to incite race wars like this.

 

[GettyRoad]

Hilarious analysis.

Please proceed, BothSidesDoIt™ Independent.

I'm an independent, man. I see through both sides. Both sides are foolish. I'm a honest voter.

 

[MongGrel]

It's because Trump holds power over them. They fear him for some reason. Half of them thinks he hates hispanics when that's not the case at all, he employs hundreds of them and even won the NV hispanic vote. He has Ben Carson (a black) endorsing him now.

 

[sandorski]

Cool story bro.

 

[Bowfinger]

It's because Trump holds power over them. They fear him for some reason.

It probably has something to do with Trump being a belligerent, thin-skinned, blowhard who attacks first and asks questions never. Not exactly the sort of person intelligent people want leading the most powerful country in the world.

On the other hand, I'm rooting for him to win the GOP nomination. He's exactly the enema the GOP needs, and he'll get creamed in the general.

Half of them thinks he hates hispanics when that's not the case at all, he employs hundreds of them

Businessmen love cheap labor. Film at 11:00!

and even won the NV hispanic vote.

That's another example of you spouting disinformation. Trump won less than a majority of the votes from the small number of Nevada Latinos who are registered Republicans and who voted in the primary. Out of the 1,500+ voters surveyed, roughly 56 of them were Latinos who voted for Trump. The majority of Latinos polled voted for someone else.

Furthermore, you completely ignored the part of that article that said Trump's approval was in the basement with all Latinos. Some 80% disapprove of him, and 70% strongly disapprove. Saying he "won the NV hispanic [sic] vote" is a major league delusion.

He has Ben Carson (a black) endorsing him now.

Racist 101: "I'm not a racist. I even have a black friend." Are you for real?

 

[SP33Demon]

It probably has something to do with Trump being a belligerent, thin-skinned, blowhard who attacks first and asks questions never. Not exactly the sort of person intelligent people want leading the most powerful country in the world.

On the other hand, I'm rooting for him to win the GOP nomination. He's exactly the enema the GOP needs, and he'll get creamed in the general.



Businessmen love cheap labor. Film at 11:00!



That's another example of you spouting disinformation. Trump won less than a majority of the votes from the small number of Nevada Latinos who are registered Republicans and who voted in the primary. Out of the 1,500+ voters surveyed, roughly 56 of them were Latinos who voted for Trump. The majority of Latinos polled voted for someone else.

Furthermore, you completely ignored the part of that article that said Trump's approval was in the basement with all Latinos. Some 80% disapprove of him, and 70% strongly disapprove. Saying he "won the NV hispanic [sic] vote" is a major league delusion.





Racist 101: "I'm not a racist. I even have a black friend." Are you for real?

All of this is worth noting because researchers have found many of them contribute to anti-immigrant sentiment and anxiety about competition for jobs and other resources. This can often be intense. We are not saying here that it is logical, or right, but that this is a pattern across the country and a known phenomenon that may have been advantageous to Donald Trump. In other words: There might be a very small but very pro-Trump segment of the Latino population that does exist and could be duplicated in other states.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ada-it-doesnt-mean-latinos-suddenly-love-him/

Call it what you want, Trump still has support from a segment of Latinos.

 

[norseamd]

I am an independent. A centrist. Both parties have done crazy things. However, leftist groups in the past have always caused violence on the streets-Black Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street, Ferguson, Baltimore, Staten Island, McKinney, Tex., this is about agitation.

I have no problem with protests, but why did these leftist groups have to agitate the situation at Trump's Chicago, Illinois rally? And you want to know why these groups (A.N.S.W.E.R), Communist Party of America, Black Lives Matter, are not allowed in the suburban enclaves? It's not right!

An account that was just registered very recently, in the middle of the presidential campaign season. Coincidence?

 

[GettyRoad]

An account that was just registered very recently, in the middle of the presidential campaign season. Coincidence?

I'm an Independent. I want to have dialogue. I want to discuss issues. Don't shut free speech down.

 

[compuwiz1]

I'm an Independent. I want to have dialogue. I want to discuss issues. Don't shut free speech down.

I'll give ya the benefit of the doubt, as long as I don't smell alter or troll too much.

 

[Bowfinger]

Call it what you want, Trump still has support from a segment of Latinos.

Some 50 million Latinos in the U.S., and a "segment" of them support Trump. Well, no shit! Ya' think? It's hilarious how desperately you'll spin to try to rationalize your deluded views.

 

[SP33Demon]

Some 50 million Latinos in the U.S., and a "segment" of them support Trump. Well, no shit! Ya' think? It's hilarious how desperately you'll spin to try to rationalize your deluded views.

So let me get this straight. In NV, Latinos had a chance to vote for 5 candidates and chose Trump right? Exactly. Quit the FUD, he can carry a segment of them.

 

[soundforbjt]

So let me get this straight. In NV, Latinos had a chance to vote for 5 candidates and chose Trump right? Exactly. Quit the FUD, he can carry a segment of them.

No, In NV (Repub) Latinos (a minority of all Latinos) had a chance to vote for 5 republican candidates. Trump won the largest share of that small minority of Latinos. That will not be as many as voted for GW Bush when he ran, more than likely less than those that voted for Romney.

 

[IronWing]

The tags on this thread lead me to conclude that the OP is fishing wholesale.

 

[GettyRoad]

The tags on this thread lead me to conclude that the OP is fishing wholesale.

I don't want racial suburban backlash. I know backlash. I've lived it. This is another Giuliani/Dinkins 1993. This has to stop.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

20 posts 4 of which are in here whose alt account is this?

 

[MongGrel]

The tags on this thread lead me to conclude that the OP is fishing wholesale.

+1

*popcorn* atm.

 

[IronWing]

I don't want racial suburban backlash. I know backlash. I've lived it. This is another Giuliani/Dinkins 1993. This has to stop.

Trolls should have to work for their catch. Laziness in trolling is a sign of societal decay.

 

[nickqt]

I'm an independent, man. I see through both sides. Both sides are foolish. I'm a honest voter.

Yes, BothSidesDoIt ™, blah blah blah, leftists, blah blah blah, BothSidesDoIt™.

Sure thing, chief. Scraping off those Bush/Cheney '04 stickers doesn't make you an Independent or a Libertarian, but if using those euphemisms makes you feel better, no harm no foul, you're just lying to yourself.

Please proceed.

 

[SP33Demon]

No, In NV (Repub) Latinos (a minority of all Latinos) had a chance to vote for 5 republican candidates. Trump won the largest share of that small minority of Latinos. That will not be as many as voted for GW Bush when he ran, more than likely less than those that voted for Romney.

My point exactly. He won the vote out of 5 candidates, including two cubans - one of which had the highest approval rating among hispanics outside of jeb (rubio). What does that tell you? And MSNBC said this can be replicated in other states because this small segment got in legally and doesn't want to be undermined by illegals so they are voting for the wall.]

It's hard to say how many that will be in comparison to Bush/Romney.

 

[SP33Demon]

+1

*popcorn* atm.

+1. Check the IP, mods.

 

[Herr Kutz]

Holy shit. Organized groups of libtards now actively attacking people who do not agree with their insane beliefs. Though this sort of thing only happened in third world countries.

 

[nickqt]

Holy shit. Organized groups of libtards now actively attacking people who do not agree with their insane beliefs. Though this sort of thing only happened in third world countries.

Holy shit. Internet conservatives now actively crying about people who protest campaign events. This sort of thing always happens in functioning representative democracies.

Gross, right?!?