• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is this picture CGI?

No. Usually these threads are split 50/50 with those saying CGI getting pwned, but that one doesn't looke modified at all.
 
Something about the picture isn't right. Especially when you invert the colors...it looks too precise...
 
No. That is most definitely a real pic, and anybody who says it's CGI needs to step away from the computer and into the world known as the outdoors.
 
the deers look like cgi to me the terrain seems hard to tell

Originally posted by: Eli
No. That is most definitely a real pic, and anybody who says it's CGI needs to step away from the computer and into the world known as the outdoors.
Click to expand...

i have about a billion deer up close that doesn't look real
 
Originally posted by: Eli
No. That is most definitely a real pic, and anybody who says it's CGI needs to step away from the computer and into the world known as the outdoors.
Click to expand...

what is this ..."outdoor" you speak of?
 
if thats real thats a perfect exposure. im into photography and so many things when done right dont look real unless scutinized. i require high-res pic. the way the lighting falls on the two deer and the way the edges dont mix with the background is really making me rethink my decision that its real. the colors and lightning don't seem to blend the way they oughta between the deer and the background.
 
Originally posted by: destrekor
if thats real thats a perfect exposure. im into photography and so many things when done right dont look real unless scutinized. i require high-res pic. the way the lighting falls on the two deer and the way the edges dont mix with the background is really making me rethink my decision that its real. the colors and lightning don't seem to blend the way they oughta between the deer and the background.
Click to expand...
Oh Jesus H. Christ. :roll:

It's so obvious that the picture is real it's not even funny.
 
Originally posted by: Baked
Where the F are the shadows? It's a CGI.
Click to expand...

shadows are not required in outdoors. overcast = no shadows
it looks likes partial overcast. the shadows are very dim and extremely soft. look behind the two deer, to the left of each one. the lighting looks to be coming from behind the cameraman. if the cameraman was facing north, the lighting would be coming from his south-southeast

Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy
Originally posted by: SKORPI0
Real - Wild deer herds on Forest Service land
Click to expand...

Now that you mention it, the rock in this one seems kind of odd. It's like the whole picture is in focus.
Click to expand...

thats called extremely small aperture. everything can be detailed and in focus. that shot was probably F/22 or F/32.

Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: destrekor
if thats real thats a perfect exposure. im into photography and so many things when done right dont look real unless scutinized. i require high-res pic. the way the lighting falls on the two deer and the way the edges dont mix with the background is really making me rethink my decision that its real. the colors and lightning don't seem to blend the way they oughta between the deer and the background.
Click to expand...
Oh Jesus H. Christ. :roll:

It's so obvious that the picture is real it's not even funny.
Click to expand...

thus its PERFECT exposure.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: xtknight
The fur is so obviously fake and the lighting is nowhere near what it would be in real life. Not to mention the dynamic range of the photo is eerily high.

Here's a real-life fallow deer picture: http://www.oxygene.demon.co.uk/gallery/2003-07-27-deer.jpg
Click to expand...


You people are fscking INSANE. You need to step the fsck outside every once in a while.

That is a real picture.
Click to expand...

And how do you know? You are just guesing like the rest of us are. Stop swearing, it's just a picture. Some people are interested in the area of CGI.
 
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: gonzaga1751
Originally posted by: SKORPI0
Real - Wild deer herds on Forest Service land
Click to expand...

well if that is a real picture they definitely enhanced that sh!t out of it
Click to expand...

word... seems like someone cranked the contrast way up in photoshop
Click to expand...

Maybe the background is real and the deer are real but they're from two different photos?

opening poster's link

fallo_deer_inverted.jpg Nothing too strange except it looks a bit too perfect...Notice the thin blades of grass over the deer that don't look natural.

fallo_deer_autolevels.jpg Ok weird...I'd swear the deer came from a different picture...grass really stands out here.

fallo_deer_autolevels_inverted.jpg Hmmmm notice the blades of grass again.
 
Originally posted by: xtknight
The fur is so obviously fake and the lighting is nowhere near what it would be in real life. Not to mention the dynamic range of the photo is eerily high.

Here's a real-life fallow deer picture: http://www.oxygene.demon.co.uk/gallery/2003-07-27-deer.jpg
Click to expand...

a quality photography that one is not. 😉
again, the best ones can be debated to know end until the artist or photographer or someone who knows comes in and explains.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top