Originally posted by: mugsywwiii
Originally posted by: CrazyDe1
Keep to the topic people...this isn't an ethics debate, it's a question. When fighting a ticket do you have to prove that you weren't going the speed in question or do you have to prove that you weren't committing the offense at all?
Seriously though, the car does not go 95.
You will be asked at some point how fast you were going. What do you plan on saying? It's possible that the answer to your question could differ from state to state, but I can tell you from my person experience sitting in the courtroom at the City of Gas City City Hall that in Indiana, it doesn't matter if you weren't going the exact speed on the ticket, if you admit to speeding at all you will be found guilty.
In court, all you would need to say was "I am accused of going 95 in a vehicle that will only do 90 at maximum speed, via a engine block. Therefore, this allegation is invalid." You don't even need to bring up how fast you were going - that's not the issue.
my $0.02
They get to ask you questions...