• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is there anything "wrong" with this statement?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
If a woman really loves a guy, she'll say yes to his proposal even if the ring he gives her came from a supermarket quarter machine. It's the thought that counts and if the woman won't accept it just because it's not a five-thousand dollar ring, it's just a reflection of how superficial she is.
Click to expand...

When my then-boyfriend/now-husband proposed, we were just starting out together and money was super tight. He bought a small 5-diamond band (about $150 if I recall) and I wore that until our 5th wedding anniversary. I still wear it on a chain around my neck because it was the thought and was given with love.

At 5 years he surprised me with a really beautiful 1/2 carat ring which I've worn ever since. I love it and doubt I'll ever want anything else. The style is very me, and I'm not afraid to wear it out for fear someone will try to cut my finger off for it.

(rant)
I'll never understand the demand of *bling* and I think the Cinderella fairy tale should die already. If a guy buys you a ring based on good intentions, a show of love, and what he can afford then you should accept it and STFU if you really love him. If it's just god awful ugly then you should try to find a comprimise.
(end rant)
 
no theres nothing "wrong" with it, its how things should be, however its not because 99% of women are superficial b!tches
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top