Is there any reason to get a high end HT?

slicksilver

Golden Member
Mar 14, 2000
1,571
0
71
If all I do is play divx/xvid movies on my dvd player and watch them on my TV? I mean does getting a Denon amp + 5.1 Polk Audio setup help? I know they make a huge difference when it comes to regular DVDs but does it help in my case in anyway?

Thanks!
 

venkman

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2007
4,950
11
81
Some divx movies do have AC3 surround sound encoded right in but even that is usually at a poor bitrate. A HT will certainly add a lot of power to the sound and pick up some of the frequencies that a TV Speaker and my Divx movies certainly do sound significantly better with my HT setup than my PC Speaker setup. It will help with your divx movies but only to amplify the poor quality audio that is already encoded. IT should SHINE if you decide to throw some DVDs at it.
 

Tiamat

Lifer
Nov 25, 2003
14,068
5
71
I assume you are using your TV as sound and vision? If so, the subwoofer aspect of the 5.1 would lend the most notable difference to your enjoyment of XVid, etc. Divx/Xvid still have bass frequencies that TV Speakers cannot reproduce.

You would probably get a pretty good improvement moving to decent 2.1 computer speakers from the TV speakers.
 

slicksilver

Golden Member
Mar 14, 2000
1,571
0
71
Thanks for the advice guys. One more piece of advice, what 2.1 or 5.1 setup config do you guys recommend if my budget is $1000? Again I reiterate that my only concern is playing divx/xvid in the divx DVD player on my 26" LCD TV. DVDs dont matter at all.
 

venkman

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2007
4,950
11
81
I saw that you mentioned a Polk 5.1 setup in your OP. I would highly recommend the Polks at your price range. I went the Polk/Outpost route with the R series always being pretty cheap on outpost.com R50 fronts, R15 Rears, Csi625 Center, a Dayton Sub, and a Pioneer 815 Receiver. Granted this is last year so the models numbers have changed. I put all that together for about $700 and it sounds AMAZING. Plus it still leaves room in your budget to upgrade the fronts (Monitor 50s) or the AVR (Denon 887, Onkyo 605), or the Sub (SVS, HSU).


The only thing I would change, if I had to do it over, is to get a better sub. The Dayton is good but too boomy for my taste. SVS makes some great subs but they are a bit pricier and maybe more than you need.
 

YOyoYOhowsDAjello

Moderator<br>A/V & Home Theater<br>Elite member
Aug 6, 2001
31,204
45
91
A couple of other options for 5.1 around $1000 would be adding a ~$150 receiver to some of these sets

http://www.av123.com/products_...tion=speakers&brand=55
http://www.svsound.com/products-sys-sbs_silver.cfm

For 2.1, you have a lot more options. If you went with 2.1 initially, you could still get a 5.1 receiver and leave yourself the option to complete the system at a later date.

Some more options for speakers open up when you're down to a 2.1 system.

Ascend Acoustics, Axiom, AV123, etc. are some internet direct options that would be great alternatives to the retail options for the same price.

HSU and SVS are a couple internet direct subwoofer options
 

Rio Rebel

Administrator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,194
0
0
For 2.1, you have a lot more options. If you went with 2.1 initially, you could still get a 5.1 receiver and leave yourself the option to complete the system at a later date.

Listen to his advice. It's golden.

Most real audio enthusiasts will tell you to get quality, and get what you can afford now, rather than getting 5.1 or 7.1 and getting crap.

Start with a good pair of stereo speakers. That's your foundation. If you're going predominantly movies, you'll want to get a sub as soon as possible. Don't skimp on the sub, but you don't have to go crazy, either. There are good solutions under $300, if you're trying to tightly control cost.

Once your 2.1 is in place, you'll most likely want to add surround. There are opposing views on this - some people will point out that dialogue is 80% of your audio in movies, so you need to get a center right away. For my taste, I can live with a phantom center better than a lack of surround, so I'd get the surrounds (go to 5.1, not 7.1. You may eventually want to be at 7.1, but those last two rears are the least important part of your system...and a good 5.1 sounds much better than a haphazard 7.1).

When it comes to matching the speakers, the most important match is between the center and the fronts. You want a consistent sound across the front stage. Matching the surrounds to the fronts is nice, particularly if you play any multichannel music or multichannel concerts, but it is not as important as matching the front stage (once again, opinions vary on how important). The sub is the one part that doesn't need to match tonally at all. I didn't even stay with the same manufacturer on the sub - and you probably won't, since few companies are great at both, particularly in the value lines.
 

slicksilver

Golden Member
Mar 14, 2000
1,571
0
71
Thanks again for the advice guys. One more laaaaast question, whats a good receiver for $150?
 

Tiamat

Lifer
Nov 25, 2003
14,068
5
71
Originally posted by: rajkanneganti
Thanks again for the advice guys. One more laaaaast question, whats a good receiver for $150?

My brother has this, and he doesnt' have many complaints:

$200
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
99,356
17,547
126
Fix the room before you go out and spend lots of dough on hardware. The room is the most important component and cheapest to fix.