Is there any info about the specs of the AMD A88X Chipset?

zir_blazer

Golden Member
Jun 6, 2013
1,219
508
136
What title says. FM2+ Motherboards are coming closer, and no one seems to have a clear idea about A88X features. You have already 3 ASUS Motherboards whose full specs were released, and 7 announced Gigabyte Motherboards.

ASUS A55M-E
ASUS A55BM-A/USB3
ASUS A88XM-A
Gigabyte F2A88XN-WIFI
Gigabyte F2A85XM-DS2
Gigabyte F2A88XM-D3H
Gigabyte F2A88X-HD3
Gigabyte F2A88X-D3H
Gigabyte F2A88X-UP4
Gigabyte G1.Sniper A88X


What it does NOT brings:

* It is not needed to have a Kaveri actually working, as ASUS has claim FM2+ support with the first generation Llano-era A55 Chipset.

* It does NOT have PCIe 3.0 support. If you check carefully ASUS Motherboards specifications, in order to use PCIe 3.0 in the 16x Slot, you specifically need a Kaveri, if not it uses 2.0, and the Lane coming from the Chipset itself to the single PCIe 1x slot is 2.0.
This is because like in LGA 1155/1150, in FM2 the Processor got an integrated, independent 16 lanes PCIe Controller, and it can use a newer PCIe version if supported by it. The same happened when Ivy Bridge was released: It has PCIe 3.0 support, and you could actually use it even on Motherboards with Sandy Bridge Chipsets, like Gigabyte did.


So basically, I haven't hear anyone saying anything convincing about what feature does A88X really brings. Additionally, A88X was to have some two lesser models, A68 and A78, which were reported in January, and they seems to be missing in action. I don't recall having seen before Desktop Motherboards with Chipsets that no one really has a clue about, what is going on here?
 

Homeles

Platinum Member
Dec 9, 2011
2,580
0
0
AMD's FMx processors have had PCI-E integrated on the APU die, so it makes sense that the chipset does not provide it.

Although... it appears that you've already stated that. Whoops.

Maybe there's more USB 3.0 and SATA ports. The usual incrementing? It's possible AMD simply did a die shrink, or it could be a straight rebrand, a la 990FX.
They are amazingly quiet about anything anymore.
Which is extremely irritating to me. Honestly, I'm into hardware mostly to read about the kinds of advancements being made. When companies go silent, I get bored.
 
Last edited:

Soulkeeper

Diamond Member
Nov 23, 2001
6,731
155
106
I doubt it'll differ from the A75 chipsets much
likely only a minor revision
essentially fm1 = fm2 = fm2+

They are amazingly quiet about anything anymore.
 

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
145
106
There isnt really any process real to be made on FCH/PCH chips. In terms of A88X vs A85X. The only thing they can really do is to add a few more USB3 and then shrink it. The old one was made on 65nm if I recall right.

The FCH/PCH chips are also living on the last straw. I doubt we see them anymore in a few years ahead. Fully integrated instead.
 

Insert_Nickname

Diamond Member
May 6, 2012
4,971
1,695
136
The FCH/PCH chips are also living on the last straw. I doubt we see them anymore in a few years ahead. Fully integrated instead.

I think that's a fair bet. Intel already uses the exact same physical die for every PCH in a generation, with the differences being in the BIOS and/or fused off.